We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Bounce back loan
Comments
-
There is some guidance here:
https://www.gdlaw.co.uk/site/blog/our-services/directors-duties-insolvency-duty-to-creditors-coronavirus
0 -
Also if the bounce back loan (or other funds) were paid to the director(s) as loans (which they'd be if there were no distributable reserves and it wasn't declared as wages), the liquidators/official receiver could claim repayment of the "loan" from the director(s) and could (and sometimes do) take legal action accordingly.Jeremy535897 said:
There is no recourse to the assets of the directors, unless there has been fraud.0 -
In this case, OP stated that some funds were used to repay part of the director's loan to the company, rather than to lend the director money, but as I pointed out earlier, this can still be an issue if the payment was made to the director while the company was not in a position to repay all its creditors, including the BBL.Pennywise said:
Also if the bounce back loan (or other funds) were paid to the director(s) as loans (which they'd be if there were no distributable reserves and it wasn't declared as wages), the liquidators/official receiver could claim repayment of the "loan" from the director(s) and could (and sometimes do) take legal action accordingly.Jeremy535897 said:
There is no recourse to the assets of the directors, unless there has been fraud.0 -
Thanks for your help - the only creditors were the director and then the BBL.Jeremy535897 said:He needs to take advice. If the company is insolvent, it should not be trading. If it was insolvent when it repaid the director's loan account in part, that may have to be repaid. It sounds like the company will have to go into a CVA or liquidation unless the director puts more money in.
The business started in June 2019 and invoiced £61K to 16 March, orders to June 2020 were £17.5K with more contracts being negotiated, all cancelled in March due to lockdown. Director put in £20K in June 2019 and is still owed £7.5K
How does this work because surely the company has always been insolvent as it owed the director from day 1 - so should never have been trading??Mama read so much about the dangers of drinking alcohol and eating chocolate that she immediately gave up reading.0 -
It is more a question of carrying on when you know you will not be able to repay your creditors. Nobody worries if the company relies on a shareholder director loan, as the only person at risk is the shareholder director, but when the company is in a situation whereby it cannot repay independent creditors, then problems arise. As I say, it is best to get advice.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
