We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Universal Credit, Husband permanently works abroad

2»

Comments

  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 5,302 Ambassador
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    airliner said:
    NedS said:
    In the case of the OP, if they were treated as a couple and the husband's full income taken into account, this would likely nil the claim
    They are not going to be treated as a couple in their current circumstances.
    Yes, which is why I said "if they were treated as a couple". I was making the point that in the OP's case, the rules likely work in their favour after it had been pointed out how the rules could sometimes seem unfair. Just adding some balance :smile:
     
    I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.
    Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter

  • Rubyroobs
    Rubyroobs Posts: 1,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Crazy rules. they are married and still presumably have an income being paid yet this isn't counted at all for UC purposes? Surely can't be correct ??
  • calcotti
    calcotti Posts: 15,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 December 2020 at 7:03PM
    Rubyroobs said:
    Crazy rules. they are married and still presumably have an income being paid yet this isn't counted at all for UC purposes? Surely can't be correct ??
    It is. Any spousal maintenance payments would be taken into account however it seems to me fairly easy to get round this by treating any payments as child maintenance (don’t know if there is any guidance on when a ‘child maintenance’ payment might be considered excessive).

    Interestingly I think for legacy benefits living apart for reasons of work or due to hospital stays would not have resulted in claimants being treated as single regardless of the length of time.
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.