Privateparkingappeal.co.uk closed - Defendant now left to fight on his own

Daridder

I am now left helpless to continue my fight against tyrannical PCM and Gladstone Solicitor. This case is quite important for car park owners getting fined within their right to park their own cars without getting fined. So I would love to hear who and what help I can get to secure this win.
PPA and I had gotten to first hearing that was adjourned as plaintiff wasn't prepared and subsequent proceeding adjourned back in March to due the pandemic. 
Ideally, I would love to have a lay representative help in PPA's absence as in my view, correct me if I'm wrong, that this case is of significance not to be lost due to its effect on other car park owners mentioned above. Suggestions are definitely welcome and would be deeply appreciated as I am a newbie in court matters.
Thank you.

Coupon-mad

No-one cares.  We don't want to read a post about them, at all. 

Please delete this thread and stop typing his name (well, one of his names) and the horrific company name.

Stop using that first line, no-one wants to read that. 

BrownTrout

You could try  "small claims advisor ltd" who is well known in these parts and does cover clarkenwell court i believe... they can advise of their fees directly
https://smallclaimsadvisor.co.uk

Daridder

@bargepole
Continuing from the thread marked for deletion:
Leaving aside the fact that you originally requested assistance from a dubious source, the fact remains that you are where you are, and still have a case to fight.

I presume that, for the original hearing in March, you had filed a Defence, and also a Witness Statement and evidence?
- Yes I have. I also think that it could be augmented with some extra points that PPA left out.
You mention 'car park owners'. Does this mean that it's a residential situation where car park permits are required?
- Yes it's a residential situation. I'd need a fob and ANPR to get through the gate.
Do you own or lease the property?
- it's owned as leaseholder
What do the deeds or lease agreement say about parking?
According to the lease, I do not have a specific bay but have exclusive right to park one car in the designated parking area. When purchasing the apartment, the right to park came with a premium of £30k and we regularly have to pay service charge to maintain the parking area in addition to the apartment.

My exclusive right as per the lease:

If the expression "the Parking Space" is defined in clause 1 of this Lease (but only if it is so defined)
(a) the exclusive right to park one private motor car (or one private motor bike) in the Parking Space

and further stated in another schedule as excerpted below which to me should serve as a reminder of what we could agree as a regulation but not agreeing to an invoice from a third party not party to the lease.

To comply with all reasonable regulations which the Landlord may from time to time make and publish in respect of the use of car parking spaces within the Parking Area
Do you have a new date for the hearing?
I don't. Last I heard from the court was back on 23/3/20 that the case is adjourned until further notice via email. Hope nothing gets lost in the post. Should I contact the court and ask rather?

Coupon-mad

I am out because the thread title is horrific and you are still thinking you need help ''in the absence'' of the person you should never have paid.

I am no longer clicking on these threads, it's almost like a wind-up.

Umkomaas

correct me if I'm wrong, that this case is of significance not to be lost due to its effect on other car park owners mentioned above.

Of no significance in the small claims court. It will have no influence whether won or lost. Just a run of the mill dispute over £100. 

nosferatu1001

SCT has no precedent setting value at all

Daridder

Coupon-mad said:

I am out because the thread title is horrific and you are still thinking you need help ''in the absence'' of the person you should never have paid.

I am no longer clicking on these threads, it's almost like a wind-up.

managed to edit fortunately.

Redx

Stick to the facts in your case and no more incorrect assumptions

The outcome of your case will have no bearing on anyone elses case , no precedent in law , just another also ran

nosferatu1001

Contact the court 

Show us your exact filed defence.  NO ifs or buts there. 

Show us you WS. 

You only ever redact YOUR persona. Info.  Nothing more.  Did younger a copy of their WS? If so show us AT LEAST the contract between them and your ma. 

Daridder

nosferatu1001 said:

Contact the court 

Show us your exact filed defence.  NO ifs or buts there. 

Show us you WS. 

You only ever redact YOUR persona. Info.  Nothing more.  Did younger a copy of their WS? If so show us AT LEAST the contract between them and your ma. 

@nosferatu1001
Cheers. Just redacted my personal info but do I need to redact the claimant name and also claim no too?