We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
been accused of lying in my disaplinery
Comments
-
Leaves the employer open potentiallly to being sued for negligent misstatement. Better to simply not to respond to the request. If the reference would be negative.elsien said:
If it’s factually accurate then why not?Thrugelmir said:
What's done is done. Your employer shouldn't give you a bad reference.furby-2003 said:I can't really do this without explaining myself and being a open forum i risk more sanctions.0 -
I disagree. Factually accurate and negligent misstatement are a contradiction in terms. If (for example) an employee can be evidenced on a clocking in system to be late every day then it would be perfectly acceptable to say so. And a valid point to put down on a reference if asked about punctuality. If the employee doesn’t want a negative reference then they should make the effort to get their !!!!!! in gear and turn up to work on time.Thrugelmir said:
Leaves the employer open potentiallly to being sued for negligent misstatement. Better to simply not to respond to the request. If the reference would be negative.elsien said:
If it’s factually accurate then why not?Thrugelmir said:
What's done is done. Your employer shouldn't give you a bad reference.furby-2003 said:I can't really do this without explaining myself and being a open forum i risk more sanctions.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
Yes but there is also a requirement that a reference is not deliberately misleading.elsien said:
I disagree. Factually accurate and negligent misstatement are a contradiction in terms. If (for example) an employee can be evidenced on a clocking in system to be late every day then it would be perfectly acceptable to say so. And a valid point to put down on a reference if asked about punctuality. If the employee doesn’t want a negative reference then they should make the effort to get their !!!!!! in gear and turn up to work on time.Thrugelmir said:
Leaves the employer open potentiallly to being sued for negligent misstatement. Better to simply not to respond to the request. If the reference would be negative.elsien said:
If it’s factually accurate then why not?Thrugelmir said:
What's done is done. Your employer shouldn't give you a bad reference.furby-2003 said:I can't really do this without explaining myself and being a open forum i risk more sanctions.
It is possible to mislead (deliberately or otherwise) without saying anything untrue. For example, suppose a business had received just one (unfounded) complaint from a customer about this member of staff and none about any other, it would be completely true to say "more customers have complained about this employee than all others put together"! However that would give a totally misleading impression and could be actionable!1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
