We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Premier Parking Logistics Court Claim Defence (Case Closed - Lost with reduced fees)
Options
Comments
-
Cool, Yeah numbering is all over the place isn't it. It was late last night I pieced it all together into one document, will correct that along with Exhibit numbers. Glad advice is all cosmetic hoping that means the actual content and points I'm trying to fight are good enough. Thanks.0
-
It is important to get the numbering correct, not just for cosmetic reasons - imagine trying to explain to the judge at the hearing that you refer to the second paragraph #6 not the first one!3
-
Update - Just to complete this thread now I lost the case. Although I was able to get the costs reduced thanks to the point about the double recovery, so that is important to remember to include for anyone reading this in future! Thanks for everyones help, its a confusing process and I wouldn't have been able to do this without this forums help.3
-
Sorry that you lost the case against WW PPL !! Shame
What points did they win on ? How much was awarded in total of their inflated claim ?
We need detailed feedback in order to help other victims4 -
Basically they won becuase they had a sign placed within view, even though it was their generic small print board and I couldn't convince them that I was parked outside the juristiction of that sign, and that everything else around that was contradicting that sign since it only covered a small area of a larger parking area, just seemed to ignore those points, was like judge just wanted to rush through the case. But at least got some costs reduced, still included their court fee £25 and legal costs of £50. But removed the additional £60 and interest they claimed on top of the original parking fine. Maybe on another day I would have had more luck.4
-
So the judgment is for the original charge plus the allowed legal and court fees , typically £175 or thereabouts
3 -
Walton Willkins is a nasty piece of work!3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards