We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fraud
Options

LeanneC83
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi all
This is my first time posting on somewhere like here but I desperately need some help. Unfortunately my in-laws have been subject to a horrendous banking scam, typically it started with someone being from the bank fraud team trying to protect their money and now they have been wiped of their life savings. I guess I'm writing to see if anyone else can give me advice to help them fight for justice against the 2 banks concerned and what the process was? I know this is rife atm but I really want to help them.
Many thanks
Leanne
This is my first time posting on somewhere like here but I desperately need some help. Unfortunately my in-laws have been subject to a horrendous banking scam, typically it started with someone being from the bank fraud team trying to protect their money and now they have been wiped of their life savings. I guess I'm writing to see if anyone else can give me advice to help them fight for justice against the 2 banks concerned and what the process was? I know this is rife atm but I really want to help them.
Many thanks
Leanne
0
Comments
-
Probably need more details. If they simply bank transferred their money to another account to 'protect it' then there may be very little they can do. The banks werent involved, so how can they fight for justice against a bank that did nothing wrong...3
-
So was it really someone from the 'bank fraud team' or someone pretending to be from the bank?Where are they in the process?Have the banks said there is nothing they can do?How did the 2nd bank come into the situation?Is it a similar situation to this?Two retirees were conned out of their savings, but the banks say they were negligent
1 -
LeanneC83 said:Hi all
This is my first time posting on somewhere like here but I desperately need some help. Unfortunately my in-laws have been subject to a horrendous banking scam, typically it started with someone being from the bank fraud team trying to protect their money and now they have been wiped of their life savings. I guess I'm writing to see if anyone else can give me advice to help them fight for justice against the 2 banks concerned and what the process was? I know this is rife atm but I really want to help them.
Many thanks
Leanne3 -
(it started with someone being from the bank fraud team trying to protect their money )Thats the key was it the genuine bank fraud team .If it was genuine then their is a path to follow .If it was any old person pretending to be any bank then that's a different path .1
-
LeanneC83 said:Hi all
This is my first time posting on somewhere like here but I desperately need some help. Unfortunately my in-laws have been subject to a horrendous banking scam, typically it started with someone being from the bank fraud team trying to protect their money and now they have been wiped of their life savings. I guess I'm writing to see if anyone else can give me advice to help them fight for justice against the 2 banks concerned and what the process was? I know this is rife atm but I really want to help them.
Many thanks
Leanne
Typical scam. Random phone calls, texts etc until the fraudster hits on someone not aware.
Did someone convince them to transfer money out from their account with Bank 1 to put it into an account in Bank 2 for safe keeping?
What have your in-laws bank stated to them?
Some info: Bank transfer fraud victims face refund lottery – Which? NewsThe world is not ruined by the wickedness of the wicked, but by the weakness of the good. Napoleon1 -
Horrible situation but you won't get any decent advice without many more details. In similar threads on the Banking forum (which is more suitable for your post) it turns out the person posting never knows the full details anyway - the person scammed tends to be too embarrassed to tell the full truth.
Anyway you're more likely to get help from someone like Tony Hetherington Tony Hetherington, Financial Mail on Sunday | This is Money or Katie Morley Katie Morley (telegraph.co.uk) to whom you can tell the full story.0 -
I do think there is more that the UK banks can do, but the FCA needs to step in and set the expectations.
Here's what I think they could do:
1. Insist that retail customers calls them back on a phone number that is unique to the transaction, the phone number being generated by the bank's website when taking the payment instruction.
2. Investigate the reason for the payment thoroughly, using metrics such as the age of the client to determine the risk inherent in the transactions.
3. Refuse to act where the client is clearly being defrauded.
4. Delay payment while a text message is sent to close relative who has agreed to act as a gatekeep for older/vulnerable customers when payments over £1000 are made.
5. Not allow payments of more than £1000 INTO personal bank accounts that haven't been open for 12 months, unless the account is associated with an address that the account holder has lived at for 10 years (e.g. been on the electoral roll at the address for 10 years AND has utility bills for five of the last 10 years).
6. Not allow payments of more than £1000 INTO business bank accounts that haven't been open for 12 months, unless the bank has a second charge over at least one director/partner/sole trader's property OR hold the money as an unavailable balance for 5 days to allow time for fraudulent payments to be returned.
There is so much more that the industry could be doing to make fraud a thing of the past, but until their regulator makes them, they won't do it because it will cost them money.
The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0 -
Which banks are involved and what have they said when contacted about this?
TSB will refund all the money if it was a sophisticated scam. Other banks have recently signed up to a refund scheme.
New protection for individuals tricked into transferring money to fraudsters has now taken effect - but not all banks are signed up to the scheme.Eight banks, covering 17 brands, have committed to implement the code immediately:
- Barclays
- HSBC (including First Direct and M&S Bank)
- Lloyds (including Halifax, Bank of Scotland, and Intelligent Finance)
- Metro Bank
- Nationwide
- RBS (including NatWest and Ulster Bank)
- Santander (including Cahoot and Cater Allen)
- Starling Bank
The largest banks have established a fund to immediately reimburse customers who are in the "no blame" category.
0 -
tacpot12 said:I do think there is more that the UK banks can do, but the FCA needs to step in and set the expectations.
Here's what I think they could do:
1. Insist that retail customers calls them back on a phone number that is unique to the transaction, the phone number being generated by the bank's website when taking the payment instruction.
2. Investigate the reason for the payment thoroughly, using metrics such as the age of the client to determine the risk inherent in the transactions.
3. Refuse to act where the client is clearly being defrauded.
4. Delay payment while a text message is sent to close relative who has agreed to act as a gatekeep for older/vulnerable customers when payments over £1000 are made.
5. Not allow payments of more than £1000 INTO personal bank accounts that haven't been open for 12 months, unless the account is associated with an address that the account holder has lived at for 10 years (e.g. been on the electoral roll at the address for 10 years AND has utility bills for five of the last 10 years).
6. Not allow payments of more than £1000 INTO business bank accounts that haven't been open for 12 months, unless the bank has a second charge over at least one director/partner/sole trader's property OR hold the money as an unavailable balance for 5 days to allow time for fraudulent payments to be returned.
There is so much more that the industry could be doing to make fraud a thing of the past, but until their regulator makes them, they won't do it because it will cost them money.
Retired at age 56 after having "light bulb moment" due to reading MSE and its forums. Have been converted to the "budget to zero" concept and use YNAB for all monthly budgeting and long term goals.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards