How will a 3 tier parking charge level proposed by the BPA fit on a legible sign? Answer = it won't

Fruitcake

C-m, you missed,

Permitted parking time is whatever our member decides, not what the local Planning Authority has approved.
Leaving site is not permitted even if the local Planning Department has approved it.
Defining site boundaries is not a requirement by the operator. Motorists art supposed to know this before they park.

Coupon-mad

AnotherForumite said:

Lets simplify the 'War and Peace' then:

By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120 / have their vehicle immobilised with a release fee of £150 / have their vehicle removed to a secure compound where no release fee will apply; however, proof of ownership will be required before release. Warning CCTV in use so as to assist with the identification of the driver in the event of any dispute.

Hows that for team work 

It fails on contract law.  No certainty of terms.

And you are never getting clamping back; get used to it.

beamerguy

Coupon-mad said:

AnotherForumite said:

Lets simplify the 'War and Peace' then:

By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120 / have their vehicle immobilised with a release fee of £150 / have their vehicle removed to a secure compound where no release fee will apply; however, proof of ownership will be required before release. Warning CCTV in use so as to assist with the identification of the driver in the event of any dispute.

Hows that for team work 

It fails on contract law.  No certainty of terms.

And you are never getting clamping back; get used to it.

I do find this so amusing, one minute they come on here looking for help. more so to understand what will happen next, and then expose their wildest dreams

nosferatu1001

AnotherForumite said:

Lets simplify the 'War and Peace' then:

By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120 / have their vehicle immobilised with a release fee of £150 / have their vehicle removed to a secure compound where no release fee will apply; however, proof of ownership will be required before release. Warning CCTV in use so as to assist with the identification of the driver in the event of any dispute.

Hows that for team work 

Look what's floated back up again, no matter how many times we've flushed....

Your suggestion fails on contract law, and you're never getting clamping back. 

Snakes_Belly

AnotherForumite said:

Or simply state:

‘By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120...’

Then the PPC would apply the applicable charge; the use of the term ‘up to’ would negate the need to specify a sum next to each term.

That is simply not going to happen. The gravy train will be shunted into a siding.  It may be Covid it may be the new CoP, or both and the Beavis case will be a distant memory.

beamerguy

Snakes_Belly said:

AnotherForumite said:

Or simply state:

‘By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120...’

Then the PPC would apply the applicable charge; the use of the term ‘up to’ would negate the need to specify a sum next to each term.

That is simply not going to happen. The gravy train will be shunted into a siding.  It may be Covid it may be the new CoP, or both and the Beavis case will be a distant memory.

They are just in total denial that the scam is coming to an end.
No doubt they will move on to other scams that are yet to be invented

Redx

It's called nostalgia , I remember it well 🤔😜

More chance of the window tax coming back !!

Never mind the fact that it was outlawed in Scotland even before POFA so they won't be allowing it at all !

AnotherForumite

Coupon-mad said:

AnotherForumite said:

Lets simplify the 'War and Peace' then:

By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120 / have their vehicle immobilised with a release fee of £150 / have their vehicle removed to a secure compound where no release fee will apply; however, proof of ownership will be required before release. Warning CCTV in use so as to assist with the identification of the driver in the event of any dispute.

Hows that for team work 

It fails on contract law.  No certainty of terms.

And you are never getting clamping back; get used to it.

Who said anything about clamping

Coupon-mad

Aha, now you are showing your plans, you want some sort of 'immobilisation' to be legal. 

Barriers here there and everywhere as revenge, then. Thanks for the heads up...

However in the context of this thread, the fact that your wording fails on a contract law basis, I think you can see that a tiered approach to parking charge levels just ain't fitting on any sign and you can't just say 'up to' any more than you can say 'costs on the indemnity basis'.

nosferatu1001

AnotherForumite said:

Coupon-mad said:

AnotherForumite said:

Lets simplify the 'War and Peace' then:

By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120 / have their vehicle immobilised with a release fee of £150 / have their vehicle removed to a secure compound where no release fee will apply; however, proof of ownership will be required before release. Warning CCTV in use so as to assist with the identification of the driver in the event of any dispute.

Hows that for team work 

It fails on contract law.  No certainty of terms.

And you are never getting clamping back; get used to it.

Who said anything about clamping

nosferatu1001 said:

AnotherForumite said:

Lets simplify the 'War and Peace' then:

By parking in breach of the terms and conditions (or contractual licence etc), the driver agrees to pay a Parking Charge of up to £120 / have their vehicle immobilised with a release fee of £150 / have their vehicle removed to a secure compound where no release fee will apply; however, proof of ownership will be required before release. Warning CCTV in use so as to assist with the identification of the driver in the event of any dispute.

Hows that for team work 

Look what's floated back up again, no matter how many times we've flushed....

Your suggestion fails on contract law, and you're never getting clamping back. 

You ddi

i mean I know you PPCs are used to lying, But you usually don't do it on the same medium....
typical ppc though 
You still don't understand basic contract law