We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Quilter Cheviot
Jimmithecat
Posts: 254 Forumite
Does anyone have any view on this - risk level 3 or 4?
0
Comments
-
Is that what QC are asking you to decide so they can take into account when suggesting investments?1
-
Yes they have been recommended by a financial advisor and that’s the risk level they were suggesting to play it safe0
-
Well nobody here is going to know enough about your personal circumstances and attitude to risk to have a view on which risk level is most appropriate for you.
6 -
My choice would be to avoid an expensive DFM especially if they have done such a bad job with helping that you end up asking us.10
-
As above, there really isn't enough for anyone on here to go on, but if you're engaging with advisers then they should be taking you through a structured assessment to identify your objectives, timescales, risk tolerance, etc, and then proposing ways to achieve these, rather than a finger-in-the-air "play it safe", and if they're unable to explain their recommendations in a way that you can understand and agree with, then seeking input from some random strangers who have practically zero visibility of your circumstances really isn't a sensible approach!Jimmithecat said:Yes they have been recommended by a financial advisor and that’s the risk level they were suggesting to play it safe6 -
Thanks all - fair enough - I was just wondering if anyone had any opinion on QC that’s all.0
-
Very expensive and apparently not very good (on the basis that they can't seem to do half their job which is assessing your risk tolerance).Jimmithecat said:Thanks all - fair enough - I was just wondering if anyone had any opinion on QC that’s all.2 -
The high charges are a concern for anyone, but at your level of risk the total returns you can expect will be relatively low. You might find QC makes more on your investment than you do, while your capital fails to keep pace with inflation as a result.
2 -
Jimmithecat said:I was just wondering if anyone had any opinion on QC that’s all.As you can see we all have a pretty low opinion of wealth managers on this forum. They seem to have no redeeming qualities above better options. If you are not confident with low cost DIY investing then try finding a local IFA who will likely provide a better service at a lower cost by searching adviserbook.co.uk and filtering the results, just over half way down on the left hand side, by selecting "confirmed independent".
2 -
The financial adviser is responsible for discussing and agreeing on the risk profile with you. That is part of what you are paying for. The DFM then follows this. So, you appear to be paying for something you are not getting.
Quilter have a salesforce. own FAs, own platform, own investments. You should never use FAs. It should either be IFA or DIY.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

