We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Outbuilding lawful development
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie
Hi, I hope someone can help as I have
0
Comments
-
How have you come to that conclusion? If they do something stupid and damage your property, that's what their insurance is for. And if they're not insured, you can still sue them. And failing that, I presume you've got insurance anyway.[Deleted User] said:As it currently stands if the outbuilding was to go up in flames and damage our property as it is outside of PD rights due to being used as accommodation this would invalidate their insurance.0 -
What do you mean by "used for accommodation"? If you mean someone is sleeping there then yes, the Council will take a dim view. They will not necessarily deny the LDC but they should take enforcement action to prevent illegal use. They will almost certainly not grant full PP for that purpose either.
However, it would be allowed to use it for eg office, music room, TV room etc, ie uses ancillary to the main house.4 -
Perhaps I've been listening to too many episodes of The Archers but what do you mean 'housing his cheap labour'?[Deleted User] said:Thanks for your response. Yes sleeping in there (Nothing like going down your garden or looking out of your bedroom window of an evening/morning to see a man on a sun lounger asleep in a sleeping bag) I’m more than happy for it to be used as a normal family would tv/office/gym but at the moment its like a doss house. The developer is using the outbuilding to house his cheap labour, whilst developing the main house, which could go on for months/years as it seems most of the time to be one man. Could they issue a LDC then enforce the rules? So will I be stuck with the current situation until they issue a LDC? I think your right re the PP very unlikely to get it as accommodation its also in our deeds that no outbuilding is to be used for overnight accommodation.Thanks again2 -
"My neighbour has built a very large outbuilding (which I generally don’t have a problem with) and has now applied for a lawful development certificate, as its apparently under permitted development"
How do you know he's applied for his? Has the Planning Dept sent you (and other neighbours) a letter, or is there a notice pinned up. Or has he just told you?
It can't be easy for him to do this anyway as the building would have to conform to current regs, and they are pretty tight - huge insulation levels, founds and structural standards, etc.
Surely any application by him would appear in the Planning Dept portal? If it does, submit your objection - based on valid reasons (not stuff like insurance...). The main one will be loss of privacy, I guess.
Tbh, I don't see him managing this - it's effectively a separate house in his garden.
And if someone is staying/sleeping there on a regular basis, you probably have reason to inform the council anyway; I doubt it's considered 'habitable' as it stands.0 -
LDC applications are not subject to public consultation and there is no formal route to register objections. They are simply considered on the factual compliance of the development with the permitted development rules.Jeepers_Creepers said:
Surely any application by him would appear in the Planning Dept portal? If it does, submit your objection - based on valid reasons (not stuff like insurance...). The main one will be loss of privacy, I guess.
The OP can still report a breach of planning rules at any time regardless of the progress of the LDC application and the Council should still investigate and may take enforcement action if they see fit.2 -
If this is troubling you, which it clearly is, then *you* need to report it to the Council - search planning enforcement or something like that at your local authority. You cannot rely on hearsay that a neighbour has done so. It might not be true or they might not have reported to the correct department. Preferably in writing, it is harder for them to ignore.1
-
There was reference to the Archers above and I agree that this smacks of modern slavery. I would want to at least pass on my suspicions hereBuilders not being exploited in some way do not normally sleep in outhouses.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards