We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Discrimination or not?
Comments
-
If you have a lawyer why are you not asking them these questions?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.7 -
ToxicWomble said:What do you want as an “end result” ?0
-
elsien said:You tell them you are unwell.They suggest you move or are made redundant.
You inform them you consider you have a disability.
They retract the move/redundancy and put reasonable adjustments in place.
I’m failing to see how that’s discrimination when you weren’t considered to have a disability at the time.You’re now back at work but will have waited 3 years to put a grievance in (2018-2012.) What exactly are you hoping to achieve after this amount of time?
Fair point. The grievance would harm their reputations which is the very least that should happen.0 -
I have been in the position where I’ve given up a job due to stress/depression triggered by work. In retrospect my company behaved quite badly.But you have to be realistic. A grievance, even if upheld, is between you and the company. It is absolutely not going to harm their reputation outside of that.It may be debatable as to whether their actions triggered your illness. There are sometimes other factors in people’s personal lives which are just as relevant.Whatever you are looking to achieve, all you may be doing is prolonging any stress on yourself. Sometimes, especially after this length of time, it’s better for your health just to let things go.
You have a job. You have reasonable adjustments. Realistically, what else do you expect to come from a grievance after this length of time?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.6 -
zpargo said:unforeseen said:Just a small point, the NHS don't decide who is disabled. It is whether you meet the conditions within the equality act 2010.
On a serious note is your 'disability' physical or psychological ? Has someone confirmed (and is prepared to put in writing) that the cause of it was your employment or are you coming to your own conclusion ?2 -
elsien said:I have been in the position where I’ve given up a job due to stress/depression triggered by work. In retrospect my company behaved quite badly.But you have to be realistic. A grievance, even if upheld, is between you and the company. It is absolutely not going to harm their reputation outside of that.It may be debatable as to whether their actions triggered your illness. There are sometimes other factors in people’s personal lives which are just as relevant.Whatever you are looking to achieve, all you may be doing is prolonging any stress on yourself. Sometimes, especially after this length of time, it’s better for your health just to let things go.
You have a job. You have reasonable adjustments. Realistically, what else do you expect to come from a grievance after this length of time?
A grievance is stressful I know but it doesn't sit right with me to let things go. Any illegal activity from an employer should be called out. Everyone should know about it.0 -
k3lvc said:zpargo said:unforeseen said:Just a small point, the NHS don't decide who is disabled. It is whether you meet the conditions within the equality act 2010.
On a serious note is your 'disability' physical or psychological ? Has someone confirmed (and is prepared to put in writing) that the cause of it was your employment or are you coming to your own conclusion ?
Well this is the thing it is impossible to prove causality though doesn't mean it wasn't the cause. But the other evidence points to unlawful practice from the employer.0 -
If you win. You don’t seem to be considering that that may not be the outcome. And poor practice isn’t necessarily illegal.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.5 -
zpargo said:k3lvc said:zpargo said:unforeseen said:Just a small point, the NHS don't decide who is disabled. It is whether you meet the conditions within the equality act 2010.
On a serious note is your 'disability' physical or psychological ? Has someone confirmed (and is prepared to put in writing) that the cause of it was your employment or are you coming to your own conclusion ?
Well this is the thing it is impossible to prove causality though doesn't mean it wasn't the cause. But the other evidence points to unlawful practice from the employer.
That said you seem to have made up your mind - please come back and let us know how you get on4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards