VCSL Successfully Appeal the Strike Out Orders

beamerguy

fisherjim said:

Interesting that this OP creates an account on here with one intention to brag about two court wins by the same PPC with no explanation or discussion I smell rotten fish!

The future of this rotten fishmonger is not looking good.  

Snakes_Belly

fisherjim said:

Interesting that this OP creates an account on here with one intention to brag about two court wins by the same PPC with no explanation or discussion I smell rotten fish!

It could easily have been heard on papers which is more difficult.

We don't know that the defendant has ever engaged with the forum. It's all too vague. At least the wins on this forum are genuine where the defendant (with help from the forum) has put in the effort.

The second post by the OP is a comment relating to the SJ case which was a strange case and has not given the PPC's an open cheque by any means. It just means that the case against the defendant has to be dismissed on other issues which in the case of VCS and Excel is not that difficult as we are seeing regularly on this forum.

Looking forward to Lamilad's report.

JB111

bargepole said:

JB111 said:

 The reality of the matter is that there will never be a definite answer until the new Parking Code of Practice is released. 

JB, that's one thing we can all agree upon.

But by the time that happens, I wonder how many operators will still be in business after taking an 80%+ hit in revenues due to the lockdowns / tier restrictions. 

Hopefully the Code is sooner rather than later bargepole.

BrownTrout

JB111 said:

bargepole said:

JB111 said:

 The reality of the matter is that there will never be a definite answer until the new Parking Code of Practice is released. 

JB, that's one thing we can all agree upon.

But by the time that happens, I wonder how many operators will still be in business after taking an 80%+ hit in revenues due to the lockdowns / tier restrictions. 

Hopefully the Code is sooner rather than later bargepole.

Shame the "colleagues" in your industry decided to spam the responses.

nosferatu1001

JB111 said:

bargepole said:

JB111 said:

 The reality of the matter is that there will never be a definite answer until the new Parking Code of Practice is released. 

JB, that's one thing we can all agree upon.

But by the time that happens, I wonder how many operators will still be in business after taking an 80%+ hit in revenues due to the lockdowns / tier restrictions. 

Hopefully the Code is sooner rather than later bargepole.

Hopefully you're out of business sooner than later. 

Redx

JB111 said:

bargepole said:

JB111 said:

 The reality of the matter is that there will never be a definite answer until the new Parking Code of Practice is released. 

JB, that's one thing we can all agree upon.

But by the time that happens, I wonder how many operators will still be in business after taking an 80%+ hit in revenues due to the lockdowns / tier restrictions. 

Hopefully the Code is sooner rather than later bargepole.

Strangely enough , it's not necessariky needed if your company and others followed the rules like your great rival PE

PE have managed to issue many court claims for £175 , £100 plus legal and court costs , which are allowed and where double recovery and abuse of process do not apply , they do not artificially inflate a £100 to £160 or £170 like their smaller greedy rivals !!

If they didn't need a PAS , neither did the rest of you

Get your signage , your terms and conditions , your methods of payment , plus the correct company on the paperwork and you may have less issues to deal with.

The pigs in a trough with an unlimited supply of food has tInted the whole system , even going back to Martin Cutts 10 years ago !!

Remind me , why did Excel lose the contract for the Peel Centre in Stockport to Care Parking ?
Or why did Excel lose Ashton Retail Park to ECP ? 

Why send out VCS paperwork when signs are Excel ? And Vice Versa !! Identity crisis ?

Why is the signage and markings so poor at your recent court loss on that auctioneers car park last week ?

If bylaws allow an emergency stop at RHA in Doncaster , why issue a parking PCN when no parking incident occurred ? As in your loss there last week , bearing in mind your companies cannot issue Penalty notices

No PAS was needed for any of those , incompetence comes to mind , overbearing harsh rules , imposing charges overnight and on Sundays for no reason , limiting KFC and Nandos parking to 15 minutes even though they were far away from the access road which was included in the timing on site , not giving the correct grace periods as stipulated in landowner contracts like at Ashton RP , etc etc

Why use subterfuge notices like privacy notices , myparkingcharge notices etc and flaunt POFA ? An 8 years old law

Stick to POFA and issue compliant notices to drivers and to keepers , follow the law yourself , as your CILEX oaths expect you to do , others seem to manage it , like ECP and Initial Parking !!

BrownTrout

Jake is a funny guy!

Snakes_Belly

 BrownTrout said:

Jake is a funny guy!

Funny ha ha or funny peculiar. 

Fruitcake

Redx said:

JB111 said:

bargepole said:

JB111 said:

 The reality of the matter is that there will never be a definite answer until the new Parking Code of Practice is released. 

JB, that's one thing we can all agree upon.

But by the time that happens, I wonder how many operators will still be in business after taking an 80%+ hit in revenues due to the lockdowns / tier restrictions. 

Hopefully the Code is sooner rather than later bargepole.

Strangely enough , it's not necessariky needed if your company and others followed the rules like your great rival PE

PE have managed to issue many court claims for £175 , £100 plus legal and court costs , which are allowed and where double recovery and abuse of process do not apply , they do not artificially inflate a £100 to £160 or £170 like their smaller greedy rivals !!

If they didn't need a PAS , neither did the rest of you

Get your signage , your terms and conditions , your methods of payment , plus the correct company on the paperwork and you may have less issues to deal with.

The pigs in a trough with an unlimited supply of food has tInted the whole system , even going back to Martin Cutts 10 years ago !!

Remind me , why did Excel lose the contract for the Peel Centre in Stockport to Care Parking ?
Or why did Excel lose Ashton Retail Park to ECP ? 

Why send out VCS paperwork when signs are Excel ? And Vice Versa !! Identity crisis ?

Why is the signage and markings so poor at your recent court loss on that auctioneers car park last week ?

If bylaws allow an emergency stop at RHA in Doncaster , why issue a parking PCN when no parking incident occurred ? As in your loss there last week , bearing in mind your companies cannot issue Penalty notices

No PAS was needed for any of those , incompetence comes to mind , overbearing harsh rules , imposing charges overnight and on Sundays for no reason , limiting KFC and Nandos parking to 15 minutes even though they were far away from the access road which was included in the timing on site , not giving the correct grace periods as stipulated in landowner contracts like at Ashton RP , etc etc

Why use subterfuge notices like privacy notices , myparkingcharge notices etc and flaunt POFA ? An 8 years old law

Stick to POFA and issue compliant notices to drivers and to keepers , follow the law yourself , as your CILEX oaths expect you to do , others seem to manage it , like ECP and Initial Parking !!

I also wonder why someone would spend considerable time and effort to write many pages of a witness statement giving the reason why they think an electronic copy of a signature is acceptable and reasonable, when it would be much simpler to sign the document.

beamerguy

And to all parking companies, this is why your victims won't be paying you much for now and the future ..... ENJOY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPDkCOJO3pc&ab_channel=AmazonPrimeVideoUK