We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Seller wants to complete the sale but stay in the house
Comments
-
Be careful. I am sure the tenant has to sign the SAT documents in the correct order and BEFORE he takes possession, otherwise it may not be a valid SAT.So I think he has to move out (to a hotel) to give vacant possession, sign the tenancy then move (back) in.You also have to fulfil your obligations as a landlord such as gas safe certificate, smoke alarms etc so you may need time to get the property legally fit for rental.1
-
Buying and then renting back to the seller is likely to be unlawful under the sale and rent back provisions. See Q38E here in the FAC's handbook https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PERG/14/5.html6
-
If you are going to grant him a tenancy the day after your purchase ::1) he must still move out and give you vacant possession, then move back2) you must (absolutely must) treat this as no different to any other tenant application so3) do the normal tenant vetting eg credit checks etc4) take a deposit (and protect it)5) proper signed inventory with photos6) all the other legally required tasks: EPC, gas report given to him before he moves in!), Right To Rent check, etc etcJust because you 'know' him, and he's lived there, does not mean you can or should ignore the legal requirements.But personally I'd not do this.Post 7: New landlords (1):advice & information :see links in next post
Post 8: New landlords (2): Essential links for further information
5 -
Thanks to SDLT_Geek and ProDave for there replies. I think I’d beater leaves this in solicitor’s hands. Thanks again.Of course I’m no expert.0
-
Yes. I realise I will have landlords responsibility particularly regarding gas and fire safety. I intend to take them seriously. Thanks.Of course I’m no expert.0
-
I was going to say exactly the same. It's definitely a problem.SDLT_Geek said:Buying and then renting back to the seller is likely to be unlawful under the sale and rent back provisions. See Q38E here in the FAC's handbook https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PERG/14/5.html
Can I ask what the seller is trying to achieve? Does he need a lump of cash currently for something? Or is he having trouble paying his mortgage? Knowing the end result required, it might be possible to structure something.
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?1 -
We are currently in a similarish position. Our buyer is buying our house as a buy to let and our seller is waiting for their new build to be finished so our buyer has said we can stay here and rent from him. We completed yesterday. Our estate agent also advised us of a gentleman's agreement however we wanted to protect ourselves and ensured both the solicitor knew and that we had a proper tenancy agreement drawn up. No problems and hopefully we will only be here a few months. I would say that £100 a week is very cheap! We are basically covering our buyer's mortgage. I asked for advise on here. Some were wary (more so for the risk to the buyer and that the solicitors would not allow it for some reason) but it's been absolutely fine.
1 -
jim_walton said:Yes. I realise I will have landlords responsibility particularly regarding gas and fire safety. I intend to take them seriously. Thanks.gas and fire are just 2 of the 98 regulations with which you must comply. I trust you have fully researched and understood the legal responsibilities....See my earlier post and links.1
-
The seller is buying a new build which won’t be ready till April 2020. He wants to complete as soon as possible because he’s signed up for the new house and must have made some financial commitments.He asked me if he could stay until his new house was ready to save him having to move to rented accommodation and then move again to the new build. I naively agreed to this.It’s becoming clear that the vendor is asking too much of me. However I will wait to see what my solicitor says.Thanks for the repliesOf course I’m no expert.0
-
Thanks Zonifer. So did your buyer buy with out vacant possession? If so then Illy go down the same route I think. Also I suggested £100 a week because he offered to pay half the Stamp Duty.Of course I’m no expert.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
