We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Selling to son

2

Comments

  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,701 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Does your son already own his own home, either with or without a residential mortgage?

    If not, I think he will struggle to obtain a BTL mortgage.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    badger09 said:
    Does your son already own his own home, either with or without a residential mortgage?
    This will also be relevant to OP's son's stamp duty land tax liability.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,765 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Shouldn't your son be checking that he can get the BTL mortgage?
    If not, you can try to sell to another landlord?
  • Mickey666
    Mickey666 Posts: 2,834 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    What’s the objection to using a solicitor for the conveyance?  Ok, it might save £1000 or so but it also means there will be no ‘insurance’ as part of the deal if anything goes wrong.  The OP is already saving on EA fees, which is almost always far higher than solicitor fees, for which there is no comeback if anything goes wrong.  I’ve sold and bought houses without an EA before now but I’d never do it without a solicitor.
    Am I being paranoid?  Perhaps, but I know someone who bought a flat conversion and a few months after completion the solicitor confessed there had been a problem (long story involving a dodgy amateur developer) and that their ownership could not be registered.  They ended up having to move out!  Fortunately, the solicitor’s professional insurance paid all their costs plus compensation so they didn’t lose out financially.  Using a solicitor was the best insurance they’ve ever had.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Properties change hands without solicitors and without contracts fairly regularly.

    If you don't need all the cash  upfront you could be the lender and dispense with a commercial lender. 


  • Mickey666
    Mickey666 Posts: 2,834 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Properties change hands without solicitors and without contracts fairly regularly.

    I’m sure they do.  And some people never bother to insure their homes or contents either.  Neither are legal requirements, it just depends on attitudes to risk.
  • Mickey666 said:
    What’s the objection to using a solicitor for the conveyance?  Ok, it might save £1000 or so but it also means there will be no ‘insurance’ as part of the deal if anything goes wrong.  .....
    ....I know someone who bought a flat conversion and a few months after completion the solicitor confessed there had been a problem....
    Selling a property to a son is very different to the example you describe.
    The buyer knows the property, the property is registered, there's little that can go wrong for the buyer.
    The seller knows the buyer. The money will be paid. There's little that can go wrong for the seller.

  • beduth
    beduth Posts: 91 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Mickey666 said:
    What’s the objection to using a solicitor for the conveyance?  Ok, it might save £1000 or so but it also means there will be no ‘insurance’ as part of the deal if anything goes wrong.  The OP is already saving on EA fees, which is almost always far higher than solicitor fees, for which there is no comeback if anything goes wrong.  I’ve sold and bought houses without an EA before now but I’d never do it without a solicitor.
    Am I being paranoid?  Perhaps, but I know someone who bought a flat conversion and a few months after completion the solicitor confessed there had been a problem (long story involving a dodgy amateur developer) and that their ownership could not be registered.  They ended up having to move out!  Fortunately, the solicitor’s professional insurance paid all their costs plus compensation so they didn’t lose out financially.  Using a solicitor was the best insurance they’ve ever had.
    No objection, just thinking I will pay someone a £1000 or more just to witness me signing a bill of sale. 
    Son will set himself up with a BTL mortgage, he will use a IFA to do this. He will engage a solicitor and have a survey done for his lender, and get any searches completed. 
    All I need to do is hand over the paperwork ( which is all together and in order) to his solicitor, sign a contract and wait for the bank transfer. Unless I am missing something and it is far more complicated. 
  • Slithery
    Slithery Posts: 6,046 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    beduth said:
    All I need to do is hand over the paperwork ( which is all together and in order) to his solicitor, sign a contract and wait for the bank transfer. Unless I am missing something and it is far more complicated. 
    The solicitor dealing for your son's lender may refuse to deal with you personally instead of your solicitor. It's their perogative as they are the ones handing over the money.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Slithery said:
    beduth said:
    All I need to do is hand over the paperwork ( which is all together and in order) to his solicitor, sign a contract and wait for the bank transfer. Unless I am missing something and it is far more complicated. 
    The solicitor dealing for your son's lender may refuse to deal with you personally instead of your solicitor. It's their perogative as they are the ones handing over the money.
    In which case the son can find a solicitor who isn't so fussy.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.