We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

More SEISS doubts

Options
1235789

Comments

  • mags21
    mags21 Posts: 614 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    SEISS 3 is a grant ("all-or-nothing") 
    If someone felt that they were entitled to the grant but not to the total amount that would be paid out could they make a voluntary repayment to satisfy their conscience?
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,733 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    mags21 said:
    SEISS 3 is a grant ("all-or-nothing") 
    If someone felt that they were entitled to the grant but not to the total amount that would be paid out could they make a voluntary repayment to satisfy their conscience?
    mags21 said:
    SEISS 3 is a grant ("all-or-nothing") 
    If someone felt that they were entitled to the grant but not to the total amount that would be paid out could they make a voluntary repayment to satisfy their conscience?
    You will see reference to voluntary repayments here:
    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tell-hmrc-and-pay-the-self-employment-income-support-scheme-grant-back

    A better option might be to make a donation to charity, but if HMRC decide in the fullness of time that the grant was not due, having already returned some of it would reduce the amount to repay.
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,231 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    As I see it, the SEISS 3 is binary yes / no with no middle-ground. 
    A partial repayment might just flag investigation and need to fully repay.  The truth is nobody knows.
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,733 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    As I see it, the SEISS 3 is binary yes / no with no middle-ground. 
    A partial repayment might just flag investigation and need to fully repay.  The truth is nobody knows.
    All of them are binary, which is why there is this voluntary option to repay some of it, I guess. It seems to me that if HMRC did decide to investigate all such cases, the flow would soon dry up!
  • justwhat
    justwhat Posts: 723 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    mags21 said:
    SEISS 3 is a grant ("all-or-nothing") 
    If someone felt that they were entitled to the grant but not to the total amount that would be paid out could they make a voluntary repayment to satisfy their conscience?
    Bad move and makes no business sense.  Every single business is going to be paying this back. Sooner or later tax will go up and even if that does not directly effect you costs will go up. 
    HMRC never gives money out like this make the most of it.
  • lisastevo
    lisastevo Posts: 78 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 2 December 2020 at 11:08PM
    Just seen this on the ICAEW website -

    “HMRC will provide specific boxes in the 2020/21 self assessment tax return for the reporting of SEISS grants. It is possible that the fourth grant will be taxable in 2021/22, that has yet to be decided”

    Could this potentially mean that the first 2 grants will be separate from trading profit therefore not included in the “significant reduction”?

    Thoughts?
  • justwhat
    justwhat Posts: 723 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    lisastevo said:
    Just seen this on the ICAEW website -

    “HMRC will provide specific boxes in the 2020/21 self assessment tax return for the reporting of SEISS grants. It is possible that the fourth grant will be taxable in 2021/22, that has yet to be decided”

    Could this potentially mean that the first 2 grants will be separate from trading profit therefore not included in the “significant reduction”?

    Thoughts?
    doubt it... the seiss was introduced to help replace income/loss , the property grants were for replacing overheads/costs of bills for property. The money was never meant to be saved or still in the bank lol 


  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,733 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    The legislation (section 106 and schedule 16 FA 2020) dealing with the taxation of coronavirus support payments (the business property based grants, CJRS and SEISS are all included in this definition) says:
    "1(1)This paragraph applies if a person carrying on, or who carried on, a business (whether alone or in partnership) receives a coronavirus support payment that is referable to the business.

    (2)So much of the coronavirus support payment as is referable to the business is a receipt of a revenue nature for income tax or corporation tax purposes and is to be brought into account in calculating the profits of that business

    (a)under the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Acts, or

    (b)under the applicable provisions of the Corporation Tax Acts."

  • Just to add fuel to the fire, on this thread on the HMRC forum, towards the end the Admin seems to suggest that you only need to count earnings, previous grants do not count: https://community.hmrc.gov.uk/forums/customerforums/sa/8b8b1039-882d-eb11-8441-00155d3ba99e
    "When considering your eligibility for the third instalment, any amounts previously received from the first and second instalments would NOT be considered as trading profits."
    I'm not sure that this is gospel and someone has asked for confirmation that this is the case but it's worth monitoring. I don't intend to claim if I can help it but it would be good to know.



  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,733 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just to add fuel to the fire, on this thread on the HMRC forum, towards the end the Admin seems to suggest that you only need to count earnings, previous grants do not count: https://community.hmrc.gov.uk/forums/customerforums/sa/8b8b1039-882d-eb11-8441-00155d3ba99e
    "When considering your eligibility for the third instalment, any amounts previously received from the first and second instalments would NOT be considered as trading profits."
    I'm not sure that this is gospel and someone has asked for confirmation that this is the case but it's worth monitoring. I don't intend to claim if I can help it but it would be good to know.



    Thank you for posting that. As you rightly point out, it can't be taken as gospel (and look how many times the question was misunderstood by previous HMRC posters). Nevertheless, I would recommend that all claimants of the third grant who find this is an issue make a note of the link, and print the item off, to add to their collection of evidence to support their claim. Let us hope HMRC can be persuaded to confirm this as, according to the letter of the law, I don't think it is correct (schedule 16 FA 2020).
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.