We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How long is it acceptable to give buyer to obtain mortgage before putting house back on the market?

245

Comments

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Clearly, your buyers have a problem that they are not sharing with you. Of course, you should put the property back on the market.

    Given how long searches are taking, you may want to get searches ordered on your house, ie the one you are selling. That may be a waste of a few hundred pounds, but it may make the difference between meeting the stamp duty deadline, or not.  
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Thanks all, no call from the EA yet. If their app was on hold due to furlough I'd have thought they'd tell us that, but could be a possible reason. And agreed, if they were being proactive with everything else I wouldn't be so concerned. I can understand not wanting to pay money out unnecessarily but the searches aren't too expensive and would at least confirm their intentions. 

    It's also annoying that I don't have the buyers number so I'm relying on the EA, and he's not the greatest at contact - I know they're busy and to be fair there hasn't been much to update us about but it is frustrating. I asked him a few weeks ago to give my buyer my number but he advised against it as they've seen so many sales collapse when things have started to go wrong/get contentious, which I can see the sense of but I do have my sellers number and we update each other regularly so we're not completely in the dark. At least she can tell me what's going on at the top of the chain and I can tell her about the bottom. I'll see what the EA says today anyway and update this thread... 
  • GDB2222 said:
    Clearly, your buyers have a problem that they are not sharing with you. Of course, you should put the property back on the market.

    Given how long searches are taking, you may want to get searches ordered on your house, ie the one you are selling. That may be a waste of a few hundred pounds, but it may make the difference between meeting the stamp duty deadline, or not.  
    Sorry, our posts crossed. I did think of doing that when I realised I could a couple of weeks ago, it just didn't occur to me but I saw it on a post on here I think, but it was just after our house was valued and I thought the buyer was literally about to get their mortgage so they'd be imminently ordering them. I may do that though.

    I've been understanding so far as I also post on a santander mortgage timeline thread where I've seen several people who are still waiting several weeks after valuation for their offers so it's not completely abnormal, sometimes the lender requests further evidence and they go back to the bottom of the underwriting pile, but if they're hugely complicated cases that might ultimately get declined then I'm just wasting time. It's a fine balance though as the next buyer could be starting from scratch and I'll be no better off :/
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Should have been back on the market before now IMO.
  • NatNat77
    NatNat77 Posts: 314 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It's going back on, just told the EA. Apparently there is an issue with the application that could take 2+ weeks to resolve, and even then there are no guarantees. Gutted :(
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Perhaps currently on furlough. 
  • NatNat77
    NatNat77 Posts: 314 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Perhaps currently on furlough. 
    No, sadly it's more complicated than that although I'm not sure I buy the story 
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Can you share?
  • Mickey666
    Mickey666 Posts: 2,834 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    I wouldn’t take a house off the market until a prospective buyer can confirm they have the funds in place.  Without funds it’s all just wishful thinking.  
    I had an offer on my last house from a ex-professional footballer and was initially delighted as I figured that funds would not be a problem.  I was wrong.  After about 10 weeks of delays the EA discovered they could not get a mortgage and it all fell through.  The eventual purchaser was a cash buyer who sent a bank statement to confirm funds were immediately available and the sale then went through very quickly.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Mickey666 said:
    I wouldn’t take a house off the market until a prospective buyer can confirm they have the funds in place.  Without funds it’s all just wishful thinking.  
    I had an offer on my last house from a ex-professional footballer and was initially delighted as I figured that funds would not be a problem.  I was wrong.  After about 10 weeks of delays the EA discovered they could not get a mortgage and it all fell through.  The eventual purchaser was a cash buyer who sent a bank statement to confirm funds were immediately available and the sale then went through very quickly.
    And, yet, people often post here that they don't like all-cash buyers. They feel that the cash buyer will be fickle, as they won't have to invest money in a mortgage application fee, etc.  Maybe, but OTOH they are actually able to go ahead as promised without being beholden to someone else.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.