We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Repayment of “Training” Costs - Enforceable?
Comments
-
Why did you sign in the first place? What would have happened if you had refused to do so?0
-
As per first line in the OP's post - ''Approximately 2 years ago my employer was informed that they require employees to be in the process of getting or have already obtained a certain qualification for staff to be able to deliver the company’s main service.''Dox said:Why did you sign in the first place? What would have happened if you had refused to do so?
I think it's obvious what the alternative would have been.1 -
Had the training started before you were given this document to sign?
0 -
Are you working in the public sector? (eg NHS or a LA) Or providing a service paid for by the public sector?
0 -
Actually it isn't. You might think that, but it would be useful to hear from OP. Their comment wasn't they would be sacked, but rather 'I was not given an alternative to signing either but it was implied that it would be detrimental to the business if we did not do it'.amazonian17 said:
As per first line in the OP's post - ''Approximately 2 years ago my employer was informed that they require employees to be in the process of getting or have already obtained a certain qualification for staff to be able to deliver the company’s main service.''Dox said:Why did you sign in the first place? What would have happened if you had refused to do so?
I think it's obvious what the alternative would have been.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!1 -
Which is exactly why I asked the question, rather than jumping to conclusions based on insufficient evidence.Marcon said:
Actually it isn't. You might think that, but it would be useful to hear from OP. Their comment wasn't they would be sacked, but rather 'I was not given an alternative to signing either but it was implied that it would be detrimental to the business if we did not do it'.amazonian17 said:
As per first line in the OP's post - ''Approximately 2 years ago my employer was informed that they require employees to be in the process of getting or have already obtained a certain qualification for staff to be able to deliver the company’s main service.''Dox said:Why did you sign in the first place? What would have happened if you had refused to do so?
I think it's obvious what the alternative would have been.0 -
The training had started when I signed the new agreement. The original agreement is quite similar but a lot shorter and mainly says “in the event that you resign during or after your training: 1. During training: 100% of the training costs paid by XXXX up to your resignation”TELLIT01 said:Had the training started before you were given this document to sign?0 -
Private sector- small organisationManxman_in_exile said:Are you working in the public sector? (eg NHS or a LA) Or providing a service paid for by the public sector?0 -
The alternative was not discussed and we were all fresh and slightly naive graduates who didn’t know any better at the time.Dox said:
Which is exactly why I asked the question, rather than jumping to conclusions based on insufficient evidence.Marcon said:
Actually it isn't. You might think that, but it would be useful to hear from OP. Their comment wasn't they would be sacked, but rather 'I was not given an alternative to signing either but it was implied that it would be detrimental to the business if we did not do it'.amazonian17 said:
As per first line in the OP's post - ''Approximately 2 years ago my employer was informed that they require employees to be in the process of getting or have already obtained a certain qualification for staff to be able to deliver the company’s main service.''Dox said:Why did you sign in the first place? What would have happened if you had refused to do so?
I think it's obvious what the alternative would have been.But to progress in the organisation, there would have been zero chance as I wouldn’t have been able to do the main part of my job. I’m not sure what they would’ve done but at the time I was concerned I’d lose my job.0 -
I don't suppose you're in a union, or a professional body of some kind, who might help you argue your case? https://www.bps.org.uk/Signature removed for peace of mind0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards