We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is my money really safe with AJ Bell Youinvest?
Options
Comments
-
eskbanker said:agent69 said:Alexland said:AJ Bell is a well run FTSE250 company and one of the few that I would be comfortable exceeding the FSCS limits with. However, as always, just make sure you are dealing with the real company not a clone scam.But how does the average man in the street know?For example, I am thinking of opening a Vanguard Lifestrategy account. When I google them I get links to vanguard.co.uk and vanguardinvestor.co.uk. How do I know these are legitimate sites and not scams?
In terms of validating sites, you can check the security certificate issued to secure HTTPS traffic to and from your browser - Google Chrome allows this to be viewed by clicking on the padlock immediately to the left of the URL.
0 -
Albermarle said:If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per bank protection
Alternatively if the bank went bust and you already had separately £85K with that bank , then the cash in the platform that was held by that bank will not be covered AFAIU.
0 -
BananaRepublic said:Deleted_User said:My understanding..
Cash in accounts on the platform £85k per bank protection
Shares and ETFs - no protection (irrespective of platform)
Funds UK domiciled - £85k protection per fund house
Funds IE domiciled - Euro 20k protection (example - Lindsell Train)If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per platform protection, but the platform does not own your shares and funds, they merely act as the adviser/broker. You will not lose your shares and funds, but you will of course have to transfer them to a new platform.Of course that does not allow for fraud, whereby someone employed by the platform sells your shares/funds and trousers the money. AJ Bell will have systems in place to limit access to trusted individuals, and to catch unexpected activity. I would have thought that this was very very unlikely.It also does not allow for the case where criminals hack into the web site and sell your funds. The level of security for a web site such as AJ Bell will be very high. For example, when I log on, I have to enter several passwords. I am a little surprised that they have not implemented security checking by means of a code sent to your phone, or the use of an encryption device as used by the Nationwide Building Society for example. However, it is very unlikely that a criminal could hack in unless you gave them your passwords, which sadly does happen when criminals phone people pretending to be employees of the fund manager. The back end systems will be very secure. How secure? That is something for a cyber security expert to comment on.1 -
BananaRepublic said:Albermarle said:If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per bank protection
Alternatively if the bank went bust and you already had separately £85K with that bank , then the cash in the platform that was held by that bank will not be covered AFAIU.
It seems that if the bank goes bust you have to claim the up to £85K compensation and not the platform.
If you happen to have money separately in the same bank then the overall compensation limit is £85K including the cash held by the bank via the platform, as far as I understand it.
It's all a bit of grey area and others may understand the situation differently . Plus each platform seems to use a different form of words.3 -
agent69 said:Thanks for the advice. If I click on the padlock on the vanguardinvestot site it says certificate issued to Vanguard in Pennsylvania, which appears to be the head office (so all looks kosher).The certificate might have the correct address but vanguardinvestot is the onsite crèche.2
-
Albermarle said:BananaRepublic said:Albermarle said:If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per bank protection
Alternatively if the bank went bust and you already had separately £85K with that bank , then the cash in the platform that was held by that bank will not be covered AFAIU.
It seems that if the bank goes bust you have to claim the up to £85K compensation and not the platform.
If you happen to have money separately in the same bank then the overall compensation limit is £85K including the cash held by the bank via the platform, as far as I understand it.
It's all a bit of grey area and others may understand the situation differently . Plus each platform seems to use a different form of words.Thanks, I didn't know that. I would have thought that if the platform is covered by the £85K limit, then as far as the investor is concerned the buck stops with them. I went to the YouInvest web site and couldn't find any confirmation or otherwise.fryderykchopin said:BananaRepublic said:Deleted_User said:My understanding..
Cash in accounts on the platform £85k per bank protection
Shares and ETFs - no protection (irrespective of platform)
Funds UK domiciled - £85k protection per fund house
Funds IE domiciled - Euro 20k protection (example - Lindsell Train)If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per platform protection, but the platform does not own your shares and funds, they merely act as the adviser/broker. You will not lose your shares and funds, but you will of course have to transfer them to a new platform.Of course that does not allow for fraud, whereby someone employed by the platform sells your shares/funds and trousers the money. AJ Bell will have systems in place to limit access to trusted individuals, and to catch unexpected activity. I would have thought that this was very very unlikely.It also does not allow for the case where criminals hack into the web site and sell your funds. The level of security for a web site such as AJ Bell will be very high. For example, when I log on, I have to enter several passwords. I am a little surprised that they have not implemented security checking by means of a code sent to your phone, or the use of an encryption device as used by the Nationwide Building Society for example. However, it is very unlikely that a criminal could hack in unless you gave them your passwords, which sadly does happen when criminals phone people pretending to be employees of the fund manager. The back end systems will be very secure. How secure? That is something for a cyber security expert to comment on.
0 -
Alexland said:agent69 said:Thanks for the advice. If I click on the padlock on the vanguardinvestot site it says certificate issued to Vanguard in Pennsylvania, which appears to be the head office (so all looks kosher).The certificate might have the correct address but vanguardinvestot is the onsite crèche.0
-
fryderykchopin said:BananaRepublic said:Deleted_User said:My understanding..
Cash in accounts on the platform £85k per bank protection
Shares and ETFs - no protection (irrespective of platform)
Funds UK domiciled - £85k protection per fund house
Funds IE domiciled - Euro 20k protection (example - Lindsell Train)If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per platform protection, but the platform does not own your shares and funds, they merely act as the adviser/broker. You will not lose your shares and funds, but you will of course have to transfer them to a new platform.Of course that does not allow for fraud, whereby someone employed by the platform sells your shares/funds and trousers the money. AJ Bell will have systems in place to limit access to trusted individuals, and to catch unexpected activity. I would have thought that this was very very unlikely.It also does not allow for the case where criminals hack into the web site and sell your funds. The level of security for a web site such as AJ Bell will be very high. For example, when I log on, I have to enter several passwords. I am a little surprised that they have not implemented security checking by means of a code sent to your phone, or the use of an encryption device as used by the Nationwide Building Society for example. However, it is very unlikely that a criminal could hack in unless you gave them your passwords, which sadly does happen when criminals phone people pretending to be employees of the fund manager. The back end systems will be very secure. How secure? That is something for a cyber security expert to comment on.0 -
Thanks, I didn't know that. I would have thought that if the platform is covered by the £85K limit, then as far as the investor is concerned the buck stops with them. I went to the YouInvest web site and couldn't find any confirmation or otherwise.
This is from the HL website Cash | Hargreaves Lansdown (hl.co.uk)
0 -
Audaxer said:fryderykchopin said:BananaRepublic said:Deleted_User said:My understanding..
Cash in accounts on the platform £85k per bank protection
Shares and ETFs - no protection (irrespective of platform)
Funds UK domiciled - £85k protection per fund house
Funds IE domiciled - Euro 20k protection (example - Lindsell Train)If the platform goes bust, you may lose cash subject to an £85K per platform protection, but the platform does not own your shares and funds, they merely act as the adviser/broker. You will not lose your shares and funds, but you will of course have to transfer them to a new platform.Of course that does not allow for fraud, whereby someone employed by the platform sells your shares/funds and trousers the money. AJ Bell will have systems in place to limit access to trusted individuals, and to catch unexpected activity. I would have thought that this was very very unlikely.It also does not allow for the case where criminals hack into the web site and sell your funds. The level of security for a web site such as AJ Bell will be very high. For example, when I log on, I have to enter several passwords. I am a little surprised that they have not implemented security checking by means of a code sent to your phone, or the use of an encryption device as used by the Nationwide Building Society for example. However, it is very unlikely that a criminal could hack in unless you gave them your passwords, which sadly does happen when criminals phone people pretending to be employees of the fund manager. The back end systems will be very secure. How secure? That is something for a cyber security expert to comment on.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards