We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Equity percentage in the deaccumulation phase

My investments are spread over a S&S SIPP & ISAs and some unwrapped funds and savings bonds & accounts.  Cash is currently at about 15% and more than enough to cover 2 years expenditure.  I will receive a full state pension in the future and have a rental property but apart from that I am relying on my investments.

I have been running with an equity percentage of 60% although some of the funds I have in my "non equity portion" e.g. PNL contain equity so the actual equity percentage may be closer to 70%.  What equity percentage are others using and do others allow this to change as the market changes - for instance I took a more aggressive position during the crash but have now sold equity to return close to the 60% mark now that markets have largely recovered.
«1345678

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,888 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 22 November 2020 at 2:55PM
    If you read this forum regularly you will see answers to your question about deaccumulation funds ranging from 100% cash ; 100% gold right through to 100% equity , so in the end you have to decide for yourself.
    I think the typical financial advice would be between 35% for the more cautious types and up to probably 70% max , with the majority in the 45% to 60% region. I have not quite started deaccumulating yet but I am around  50% ( like you there is some debate about how to classify some IT's, ) + cash fund separate.

  • Also depends on the size of your pot vs typical annual expenditure. If your pot is very large then you can take a large loss for several years. In this case you can be in equities almost 100%. If you can’t afford a sustained loss and you are at the beginning of retirement then you need lots of fixed income.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,888 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    In this case you can be in equities almost 100%

    You also need strong nerves for this, so would not suit everybody even if they had a large pot/lower expenditure .

  • OldMusicGuy
    OldMusicGuy Posts: 1,768 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I read Michael McClung's book "Living Off Your Money: The Modern Mechanics of Investing During Retirement" and used that to set my equity percentage when I retired. I'm not chopping and changing it, although once I am through the first 5 to 7 years I will revisit my strategy to see if it still makes sense. 
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,852 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I read Michael McClung's book "Living Off Your Money: The Modern Mechanics of Investing During Retirement" and used that to set my equity percentage when I retired. I'm not chopping and changing it, although once I am through the first 5 to 7 years I will revisit my strategy to see if it still makes sense. 
    Thats what I intend to do. Somewhere between 55-65% for a 40 year retirement. I am also seriously considering a guaranteed income element before SP kicks in using a similar pool to a modern annuity investment. Its tricky though as it wouldn't actually be guaranteed since there needs to be a risk element in there. I suppose that a real fixed term annuity would work but might be too pricey.  
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,343 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    My allocation based on detailed assessment of meeting the retirement requirements results in a 60% overall equity allocation.  Cash is included as non-equity.

    As the allocation is determined by the need to meet unchanging objectives it does not make sense to change it because of short term changes in economic conditions.  One's life-savings are too important to fiddle with in the possibly unsatisfied hope of making quick gains.
  • shinytop
    shinytop Posts: 2,169 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 November 2020 at 5:13PM
    About 55% equities, 18% cash and the rest wherever HSBC and Vanguard decide to invest it. I may go up to 60 or 65% equities but we have significant DB and also full state pensions.  
  • pip895
    pip895 Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Linton said:
    As the allocation is determined by the need to meet unchanging objectives it does not make sense to change it because of short term changes in economic conditions.  One's life-savings are too important to fiddle with in the possibly unsatisfied hope of making quick gains.
    My change in Equity allocation has strict bounds - within the range 60 to 80%. 
    Actually during the crash I never got close to 80% although that had been my original plan - in fact it was quite difficult just maintaining 60%.  At the point where equities were at their lowest I managed just 63% equities and had converted about 25% of my non equity holdings (mainly cash) to do it.  Equity recovered and by mid October it was up to 73% of my portfolio at which point I sold to return my percentage in equity to about 63% which is more or less where I am at the moment.  It has been a profitable process I am well ahead on the calendar year despite holding property funds and a high-ish percentage in the UK/ not enough Tec/US stock. Also very little of the monies hit the bottom of the market and I didn't pick the best investments when it did but it has been a good learning exercise - at least I have proved to myself that I can hold my nerve.   

    With this thread I am trying to get a feel for if the 60% -80% equity position is reasonable or reckless. 
    I would quite like my default equity to go a little higher perhaps to 70% - mainly because I don't much like my options in the "non equity" space.
  • TBC15
    TBC15 Posts: 1,500 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    I’ve been retired about a year and half.

    Apart from my 3yr cash bucket I’m 100 equities.


  • pip895
    pip895 Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    TBC15 said:

    I’ve been retired about a year and half.

    Apart from my 3yr cash bucket I’m 100 equities.


    How much do you allow the cash % drop before topping up from equity in a downturn? Some say there is a sweet spot around 80% equities..  Do you have other income from say DB pension?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.