PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Govt makes haphazard attempt to alleviate some of the blockages in flat sales mess caused by EWS1

Options
1234568»

Comments

  • forgot to say all happy with bankruptcy option so they can screw the freeholder which is an offshore company as bills of 80k for 2 bed and 8000 pa service charge (was 2000) a joke with no help from government as rejected by building safety fund.

    How will they 'screw' the freeholder if they lose their homes, assuming the flats are worth more than 80K?
    The freeholder won`t get paid?

    They won't get paid by the leaseholder, but they will get their flat back to sell to someone else! If the flat is worth more than 80k then they can pay for that share of the works and the rest is pure profit! Hardly being screwed over.
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    forgot to say all happy with bankruptcy option so they can screw the freeholder which is an offshore company as bills of 80k for 2 bed and 8000 pa service charge (was 2000) a joke with no help from government as rejected by building safety fund.

    How will they 'screw' the freeholder if they lose their homes, assuming the flats are worth more than 80K?
    The freeholder won`t get paid?

    They won't get paid by the leaseholder, but they will get their flat back to sell to someone else! If the flat is worth more than 80k then they can pay for that share of the works and the rest is pure profit! Hardly being screwed over.
    Really?.......who will be buying...?

    "as bills of 80k for 2 bed and 8000 pa service charge (was 2000) a joke with no help from government as rejected by building safety fund."
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    renifer7 said:
    HTB will be a disaster for so many people.
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Will it not be unsustainable for the Gov to foot the tab when the developers are the ones who  built these homes. I acknowledge that the testing procedures at the time were inadequate, which has nothing to do with the gov per say. Bare in mind a buried report showing unsafe cladding was when Labour were in power.

    Effectively do you think it's right for the tax payers to foot the bill at this time? 
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 October 2021 at 1:47PM
    csgohan4 said:
    Effectively do you think it's right for the tax payers to foot the bill at this time? 
    Was the cladding fitted on government, council, building regulations advice? Was it a requirement to meet state imposed insulation standards?

  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    csgohan4 said:
    Effectively do you think it's right for the tax payers to foot the bill at this time? 
    Was the cladding fitted on government, council, building regulations advice? Was it a requirement to meet state imposed insulation standards?

    So would you be happy to have a substantial rise in tax to pay for this? I would not be, and I do not and never will buy a flat even before the cladding scandal. 

    Labour are the Anti Government and what Gov says, they will oppose for the sake of being opposition, but with all the rhetoric, would they want their working class voters to foot the bill when it comes to it? Nothing is mentioned, perhaps they think a magic money tree will appear.

    Either way the Gov is in  a hard place and a rock and indeed the taxpayers
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    No way they can put over a tax payer bailout in the wake of Covid IMO, people should have just stayed away from this overpriced rubbish in the first place.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.