We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Getting a ticket for moving out of the way of an emergency vehicle
I recently heard of someone who moved into a bus lane to allow an ambulance to get past him. His car reg was clocked by a camera and he ended up getting a ticket.
The more I read into this the more it seems that you should not move out of the way of emergency vehicles if that involves entering box junctions, bus lanes, red lights etc.
Can anyone shed any light on whether the law allows some tolerance in these situations?
The more I read into this the more it seems that you should not move out of the way of emergency vehicles if that involves entering box junctions, bus lanes, red lights etc.
Can anyone shed any light on whether the law allows some tolerance in these situations?
No Unapproved or Personal links in signatures please - FT3
1
Comments
-
Surely the big question mark is why the ambulance didn't just use the bus lane?
IF it really happened, rather than being an urban legend "friend-of-a-friend", then the ticket issue would be automated, but it would be easily appealed and quashed.
1 -
It's enough of an issue the police and the RAC have a page of advice on it. Indeed, the highway code (rule 219) even tells you that you should comply with all traffic signs even when trying to allow the vehicle through. The police page tells you that if you do break the stop line of a red light, you must provide proof of the emergency vehicle to get it appealed and quashed. So no, not "easily" done.AdrianC said:Surely the big question mark is why the ambulance didn't just use the bus lane?
IF it really happened, rather than being an urban legend "friend-of-a-friend", then the ticket issue would be automated, but it would be easily appealed and quashed.2 -
This short video explains it all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btRHvQEIkcUAnd there's more advice here https://www.bluelightaware.org.uk/The official police advice is to comply with the law, and NOT to cross the stop line unless directed to do so by a uniformed police officer.
2 -
This is basic driving skills. It was covered by my driving instructor when I learnt to drive and I'm pretty sure it's mentioned in the highway code.spiritus said:I recently heard of someone who moved into a bus lane to allow an ambulance to get past him. His car reg was clocked by a camera and he ended up getting a ticket.
The more I read into this the more it seems that you should not move out of the way of emergency vehicles if that involves entering box junctions, bus lanes, red lights etc.
Can anyone shed any light on whether the law allows some tolerance in these situations?
I'm sure quality of driving lessons has slipped since the introduction of a multiple-choice theory test. Middle lane driving is endemic, very few people seem to be aware of speed limits or the need to "make good progress" and now people are questioning if it's ok to break the rules to let through an ambulance.2 -
The only authority that has the right to force you to move are the police.spiritus said:I recently heard of someone who moved into a bus lane to allow an ambulance to get past him. His car reg was clocked by a camera and he ended up getting a ticket.
The more I read into this the more it seems that you should not move out of the way of emergency vehicles if that involves entering box junctions, bus lanes, red lights etc.
Can anyone shed any light on whether the law allows some tolerance in these situations?
The ticket for bus lane infringements would come from the local council and of course they have discretion whether to cancel the ticket or not. You may not be so lucky of you pass through a red light though.0 -
These things can and do regularly happen. Drivers of emergency vehicles are specifically trained not to intimidate other drivers into running red lights or otherwise breaking the law but they also have to try and anticipate what another driver might do and running up the inside of traffic with sirens blaring might not be the safest thing to do as most driver's first instinct would be to pull over.AdrianC said:Surely the big question mark is why the ambulance didn't just use the bus lane?
IF it really happened, rather than being an urban legend "friend-of-a-friend", then the ticket issue would be automated, but it would be easily appealed and quashed.0 -
Its for the ambulance to go into the bus lane not you; they are the ones trained to deal with situations like going through red lights and similarly know the level of emergency they are dealing with and so what justifiable risks they can take.
If you do get a ticket you can appeal to the council’s better nature to quash it but they are not under any obligation to do so.1 -
I find that interesting, obviously as all good drivers know, the speed limit is a limit, not a target (rule 146 and also 125). However, I found a driving test site which advises on where instructors count a fault under "making progress" asSupersonos said:
This is basic driving skills. It was covered by my driving instructor when I learnt to drive and I'm pretty sure it's mentioned in the highway code.spiritus said:I recently heard of someone who moved into a bus lane to allow an ambulance to get past him. His car reg was clocked by a camera and he ended up getting a ticket.
The more I read into this the more it seems that you should not move out of the way of emergency vehicles if that involves entering box junctions, bus lanes, red lights etc.
Can anyone shed any light on whether the law allows some tolerance in these situations?
I'm sure quality of driving lessons has slipped since the introduction of a multiple-choice theory test. Middle lane driving is endemic, very few people seem to be aware of speed limits or the need to "make good progress" and now people are questioning if it's ok to break the rules to let through an ambulance.- Crawls along at slow speeds on clear roads.
- Makes no attempt to achieve maximum speeds for the road when safe to do so
0 -
Deleted_User said:
I find that interesting, obviously as all good drivers know, the speed limit is a limit, not a target (rule 146 and also 125). However, I found a driving test site which advises on where instructors count a fault under "making progress" asSupersonos said:
This is basic driving skills. It was covered by my driving instructor when I learnt to drive and I'm pretty sure it's mentioned in the highway code.spiritus said:I recently heard of someone who moved into a bus lane to allow an ambulance to get past him. His car reg was clocked by a camera and he ended up getting a ticket.
The more I read into this the more it seems that you should not move out of the way of emergency vehicles if that involves entering box junctions, bus lanes, red lights etc.
Can anyone shed any light on whether the law allows some tolerance in these situations?
I'm sure quality of driving lessons has slipped since the introduction of a multiple-choice theory test. Middle lane driving is endemic, very few people seem to be aware of speed limits or the need to "make good progress" and now people are questioning if it's ok to break the rules to let through an ambulance.- Crawls along at slow speeds on clear roads.
- Makes no attempt to achieve maximum speeds for the road when safe to do so
The fault which an examiner (not instructor!) would mark under the heading of Progress is defined by the DVSA as "driving too slowly for road and traffic conditions". Note it makes no explicit mention of speed limits: there are many circumstances in which driving at or near the limit is not safe.The point of the test is to ascertain that the candidate is safe to be allowed to drive unsupervised, potentially for decades to come. Anyone who is unable to drive at the limit (when it is safe to do so), or who cannot judge what is a safe speed, is not a safe driver.
4 -
But in busy built up areas, people use common sense.[Deleted User] said:The official police advice is to comply with the law, and NOT to cross the stop line unless directed to do so by a uniformed police officer.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards