We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
High Yield Defensive Stocks
Options

MonroeM
Posts: 174 Forumite

I have a relatively small proportion of my portfolio in cash from a recent pension transfer into a SIPP. I decided I wanted to invest this money into some relatively high yield defensive stocks (3/4 different shares) with some potential for growth.
As an example, several weeks ago I invested in Legal & General at 180.00 and it now stands at 232.00 but also has a yield of 7.5% so it seems to fit in with my requirements. Just recently I also added GSK at 1440.00 so in my view it has growth potential and also a decent yield of 5.6%.
These investments are for the long term so any share price fluctuation or volatility does not particularly matter as long as the yield is fairly reliable. At this stage any yield will not be taken as income so all dividends will be reinvested.
I am still looking for another one or two stocks into to invest in so I am very open to any opinions or suggestions to any shares that fit this criteria? Thank you.
As an example, several weeks ago I invested in Legal & General at 180.00 and it now stands at 232.00 but also has a yield of 7.5% so it seems to fit in with my requirements. Just recently I also added GSK at 1440.00 so in my view it has growth potential and also a decent yield of 5.6%.
These investments are for the long term so any share price fluctuation or volatility does not particularly matter as long as the yield is fairly reliable. At this stage any yield will not be taken as income so all dividends will be reinvested.
I am still looking for another one or two stocks into to invest in so I am very open to any opinions or suggestions to any shares that fit this criteria? Thank you.
0
Comments
-
I guess "defensive" means different things to different people and in my mind "defensive" and "high yield" are unlikely to go together. L&G or GSK should have scope for growth and should provide stable, reliable dividends, but if the stock market collapsed they would drop, too. My use of the term "defensive" would be for stocks that held up better during any stock market collapse, probably acting more like Bonds, which tends to mean lower yields and less scope for growth in a rising market. I think that the most defensive stock I currently have, is Ruffer (Lon:RICA), which has low yield and low growth but have the aim "not to lose money in any 12 month period, and to grow the value of our investors’ wealth over the long haul", which means a bias to very safe assets and inflation linked Gilts.3
-
Point taken and I totally agree with your comment. I should have clarified that I won’t be needing this sum of money anytime soon hence it will be invested for the long term. Therefore, I am happy for this part of my portfolio to be invested in equities but those in my opinion with a relatively defensive quality. I already have wealth preservation funds/IT’s in other parts of my portfolio.1
-
If holding this for the long term and not taking an income why do you want high yield? I would be focussing on total return. High yield companies, even with dividends reinvested, often have lower prospects for growth. Don't confuse high yield with high total return. If building a long term growth portfolio I would be more inclined to filter out higher yielding stock than concentrate on them. What would you rather hold, a dinosaur like British American Tobacco or Amazon who have never paid a dividend?
4 -
Supermarkets, SBRY, MRW, TSCO1
-
GSK hasn't increased it's dividend in approaching 5 years. Once in a while opportunties present themselves. Doesn't make high investing in yield shares the ideal strategy though.2
-
I have a relatively small proportion of my portfolio in cash from a recent pension transfer into a SIPP. I decided I wanted to invest this money into some relatively high yield defensive stocks (3/4 different shares) with some potential for growth.
Single company shares increases risk. Having only 3-4 shares increases the risk.
HYP went out of fashion in the credit crunch as it failed abysmally during that period. So, what is it about that strategy that makes you think it is both lower risk and likely to give better returns relative to the risk?
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.3 -
ColdIron said:If holding this for the long term and not taking an income why do you want high yield? I would be focussing on total return. High yield companies, even with dividends reinvested, often have lower prospects for growth. Don't confuse high yield with high total return. If building a long term growth portfolio I would be more inclined to filter out higher yielding stock than concentrate on them. What would you rather hold, a dinosaur like British American Tobacco or Amazon who have never paid a dividend?1
-
I have M&G and Vodafone on my radar.1
-
NG and UU?
1 -
I own National Grid. Pretty safe dividend paying stock. Fits well into my portfolio.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards