We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
House built 1751 - Rising Damp
ryby30
Posts: 8 Forumite
Hijklmn byhhy
0
Comments
-
You could get a quote from a damp proof company for treating that.0
-
What's the floor on both sides of that internal wall , suspended or concrete?
Any chance of some pics of the gable end from outside including the ground?0 -
AskAsk said: You could get a quote from a damp proof company for treating that.And being a listed building, any work carried out must be approved by the local conservation officer or you risk a criminal prosecution. Injected DPC and waterproof render/plaster will be rejected (and quite rightly too) - If one of these snake oil salesmen damp proof surveyors tells you otherwise, apply a large steel toe capped boot to his posterior, and perhaps a two by four clue bat to the back of the head.DO NOT have injected DPC or waterproof render/plaster done.Find an independent surveyor with extensive experience of old (and listed) buildings without any connection to the Property Care Association (PCA) or any damp & timber treatment company. There are a few out there, and it will cost you a bit of money, but in the long term, it will be money wisely spent.The concrete floor may in fact be limecrete depending on when it was put in - Ask the vendors about it. If they don't know, it can be tested for cement content.Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.4 -
The surface of that wall looks very smooth, so I would start by investigating whether it has been replastered in something modern that is preventing the moisture being released into the atmosphere.0
-
One side is concrete and the other is suspended. There is approximately 8inchs in height difference between the wooden and concrete. The concrete is the lower floor. The outside is then at least a foot lower than the concrete floor.Homer_home said:What's the floor on both sides of that internal wall , suspended or concrete?
Any chance of some pics of the gable end from outside including the ground?0 -
I would be 100% certain that this wall has been replastered at some point in the early 90’s.Apodemus said:The surface of that wall looks very smooth, so I would start by investigating whether it has been replastered in something modern that is preventing the moisture being released into the atmosphere.0 -
Please would you post us a photo of the gable wall from outside? The whole thing if possible.What are the ground conditions like out there?What is the room used for? Does it have windows? It looks dark (of course, it could have been dark outside)What's behind you in that photo?Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
I’ll get an outside picture today and post. Outside has an old concrete footpath approximately 300mm lower than the floor level in this room. The room has been used as a utility and a toilet. It has one large window. There had been a downpipe partially damaged at the corner of the house, I’m certain water would have penetrated from this. There is also an external boundary wall which is tied into the outer skin of brick on the house, this will also be allowing water to penetrate. However the damp seems heavily concentrated on this adjoining internal wall.Doozergirl said:Please would you post us a photo of the gable wall from outside? The whole thing if possible.What are the ground conditions like out there?What is the room used for? Does it have windows? It looks dark (of course, it could have been dark outside)0 -
Exactly this. Looks like an old house which has been 'modernised' without understanding or appreciating the original construction and modern materials aren't appropriate.Apodemus said:The surface of that wall looks very smooth, so I would start by investigating whether it has been replastered in something modern that is preventing the moisture being released into the atmosphere.It needs looking at by a historic buildings architect or surveyor.0 -
** directly behind me is the back door to the house. I have seen previous old properties having poorly fitted external doors which have allowed water to gradually soak the floor and over time this has caused rising damp.Doozergirl said:Please would you post us a photo of the gable wall from outside? The whole thing if possible.What are the ground conditions like out there?What is the room used for? Does it have windows? It looks dark (of course, it could have been dark outside)What's behind you in that photo?
* I am a building contractor myself.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

