We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Any advice on using Barnard Marcus's conveyancing services for buying a property?
Options
Comments
-
Yep. But also people whose solicitors didn't do their job of properly flagging these expenses and these risks. It seems the risk that solicitors might do a sloppy job increases if the solicitors receive business from the estate agents. Who would have thought?2
-
AFAIK, Barnard Marcus (Who part of Sequence / Connells) don't have their own conveyancer. They'd use whoever the local branch has cut a deal with (or could be a number of branches clubbed together).
Either way, wouldn't touch them. As above, use someone independent of the EA. More than anything, because you're likely to get a better deal as no-one is skimming.
1 -
Thank you everyone for your opinions. It feels like we got a great smack over the head, what a wake up call! It definitely sounds like a bad idea and unsafe idea to use their internal conveyancer.
We actually just heard back from the EA yesterday, turns out the property is not just an average sale, it's one that's being sold by a new-build company after a part-exchange and they are looking for a real quick sale (completion before Christmas). They've asked everyone who's made offers (6 including us) to submit their final and best offer. We did think the property was suspiciously underpriced, so we suspected the owners were looking for some form of bidding war, but not this.
I don't know if this is common practice, but this was certainly the first time we even heard about the 'best and and final offer strategy'. Are we right to think the vendor company deliberately underpriced the property so they could get all attention possible and force out everyone's maximum budget and then take their pick? Our broker said this company will pressure us to hell to meet the deadline, which is unreasonable and unrealistic.
We decided to give up on this property which is a great disappointment, it would have been decent for the EA to make clear of all this from the outset.0 -
emily9 said:We actually just heard back from the EA yesterday, turns out the property is not just an average sale, it's one that's being sold by a new-build company after a part-exchange and they are looking for a real quick sale (completion before Christmas). They've asked everyone who's made offers (6 including us) to submit their final and best offer. We did think the property was suspiciously underpriced, so we suspected the owners were looking for some form of bidding war, but not this.
I don't know if this is common practice, but this was certainly the first time we even heard about the 'best and and final offer strategy'. Are we right to think the vendor company deliberately underpriced the property so they could get all attention possible and force out everyone's maximum budget and then take their pick?
Bid as much as you want to pay. If somebody else wants to pay more, then let them.Our broker said this company will pressure us to hell to meet the deadline, which is unreasonable and unrealistic.
Perfectly fair and reasonable - so long as you know in advance, which you do.
What'll happen if you can't meet the deadline? They won't find anybody else to complete more quickly.
Basically, it's like any corporate sale - a repo, PX, whatever. They want to get it shifted asap for as much as possible. Sentiment doesn't come into it.We decided to give up on this property which is a great disappointment, it would have been decent for the EA to make clear of all this from the outset.
The agent is paid by the seller to sell the property. They are not your friend in any way. Not that it makes much difference... Any seller could put similar pressure on the process. After all, every seller wants to get the sale out the way asap, for as much as possible... right?
The main difference is that you expect it of a corporate sale, whereas you might be disappointed that that nice Mrs Miggins has suddenly turned hard-headed, when you thought she really liked you and really wanted you to live in her old home...2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards