Can I appeal redundancy for unfair dismissal?

Hello, hope someone can advise.
I’ve recently been made redundant following a consultation and interview process. I was in a selection pool consisting of 2 males and 2 females. 
Only myself and 2 males interviewed and I was made redundant. The other female didn’t take part in the interview as she was on maternity and stressed.
Is this fair? I suppose the males could have claimed sex discrimination, where do I stand on this? 
Any help would be appreciated :-) thank you 

Replies

  • JReacher1JReacher1 Forumite
    4.6K Posts
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    Forumite
    This is from citizens advice

    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/how-citizens-advice-works/media/press-releases/citizens-advice-faqs-can-you-be-made-redundant-while-pregnant-or-on-furlough/


    There is additional protection for women who are on maternity leave, or those on shared parental leave. If you are on maternity or parental leave, and there is a genuine reason to make your role redundant, your employer must offer you suitable alternative work if they have it. They should give you this as a priority over other employees.”

    If they were making one out of four roles redundant this would seem to suggest that the person on maternity leave is protected. 
  • Comms69Comms69 Forumite
    14.2K Posts
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    What do you think isnt fair?
  • ThrugelmirThrugelmir Forumite
    89.5K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    Redundancy is a fair reason for dismissal. 
  • AnamoxAnamox Forumite
    174 Posts
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Good to see the old timers completely missing the point as usual.

    Are you a member of a union to discuss this with? It depends on the situation of the other female, you never know they may have contacted her by other means and decided she was the best one to keep? If not, it may be as JReacher says. 
  • Comms69Comms69 Forumite
    14.2K Posts
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Anamox said:
    Good to see the old timers completely missing the point as usual.

    Are you a member of a union to discuss this with? It depends on the situation of the other female, you never know they may have contacted her by other means and decided she was the best one to keep? If not, it may be as JReacher says. 
    Great advice, thanks for that. It wasnt obvious at all.... and your post added loads to the discussion
  • JReacher1JReacher1 Forumite
    4.6K Posts
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    Forumite
    Comms69 said:
    Anamox said:
    Good to see the old timers completely missing the point as usual.

    Are you a member of a union to discuss this with? It depends on the situation of the other female, you never know they may have contacted her by other means and decided she was the best one to keep? If not, it may be as JReacher says. 
    Great advice, thanks for that. It wasnt obvious at all.... and your post added loads to the discussion
    I don’t normally disagree with you but I think it’s pretty obvious from the OP’s post what they were questioning was unfair. 

    To sum up they wanted to know whether it was fair that one of the four people at risk of redundancy didn’t appear to go through the same process as the other three. As that person was on maternity based on the link I posted it does appear to be fair to treat people on redundancy differently if they are on maternity. 
  • edited 3 November 2020 at 7:45PM
    ThrugelmirThrugelmir Forumite
    89.5K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 3 November 2020 at 7:45PM
    Anamox said:
    Good to see the old timers completely missing the point as usual.


    Supposition is that the individual on maternity leave is immune to the impact of the reorganisation within the business. For which there's nothing to suggest there is as yet. 
  • AnamoxAnamox Forumite
    174 Posts
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Redundancy is a fair reason for dismissal. 
    Except for when it is not fair, which happens a lot more than your comment infers. 
  • edited 3 November 2020 at 10:44PM
    avawat20avawat20 Forumite
    157 Posts
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 3 November 2020 at 10:44PM
    Redundancy is a fair reason for dismissal. 
    Correct but the process needs to be followed for it to be fair. If a fair process is not followed then it can be deemed an unfair dismissal.

    OP - those on maternity leave in a redundancy situation have priority for suitable alternative roles as it's a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010.
  • edited 4 November 2020 at 12:30AM
    ThrugelmirThrugelmir Forumite
    89.5K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 4 November 2020 at 12:30AM
    Anamox said:
    Redundancy is a fair reason for dismissal. 
    Except for when it is not fair, which happens a lot more than your comment infers. 
    To put it bluntly. Someone is going to lose their job. Not pleasant making people redundant. Anybody that suffers the fate has my empathy. Suffered the same fate myself over my working life. To argue a personal position requires something substantive. People often are tainted by their own personal experience and feeling of injustice.  
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Did you know there's an MSE app?

It's free & available on iOS & Android

MSE App

Regifting: good idea or not?

Add your two cents to the discussion

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools