We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying with partner, which costs are fair to share?

2

Comments

  • Aranyani
    Aranyani Posts: 817 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper
    rik111 said:
    Aranyani said:
    If I were you I'd just buy on your own again, and let him live there if you want to.  Even if that means a different property. 
    Errr they covered that, can’t afford to get they want on their own and presume something in their price range would be a side step so not worth moving.....
    Yeah but they also can't agree on how to share fairly.  We don't know exactly what she can afford on her own, but even staying put seems a better idea rather than getting financially tied together when they aren't on the same page at all.
  • Angela_D_3
    Angela_D_3 Posts: 1,071 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 1 November 2020 at 10:47AM
    please please take advice from someone who learnt this the hard way.  No way does he keep his house and you sell yours.  If you split history will be rewritten I promise you and you’ll end up with less than you have now and he will have half the new house AND his current property.  I assume you aren’t married and therefore in anyway protected ?  I’d just say I’m happy as we are tbh 
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 23,148 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    What is fair is what you both agree on. Since you are asking here it would appear that you are  not in agreement 
  • Emma2804
    Emma2804 Posts: 6 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    edited 1 November 2020 at 12:52PM
    Okay, going to try & explain some points raised by a few posters above. His property is 150miles away & his friend currently rents the property (currently makes no profit as his friend doesn’t earn much so he just breaks even on the mortgage costs  The thought being it helps hus friend & it helps him as he trusts the place will be looked after & there’s no need for a management company or fees-his friend is moving out next year so whoever moves in he will charge a more favourable rent to to more than cover just the mortgage). We both want to live in the area of my property. My place is a leasehold property (his isn’t) which very soon with the shortening lease will start to depreciate the house value, or incur a big bill extending the lease. Hence why he keeps his & I sell mine I do not want the hassle of keeping it on & renting it out. Nor could we buy together somewhere if we both kept our properties. For now we’re keeping his rental property as a future nest egg for us both (he will use the income it makes to even up the shares in our property over time). It isn’t worth him selling his as he’s only owned it a short amount of time & the area it is in hasn’t risen as much as my area so there is little equity & tbh most would be lost to fees in selling. 
    Having been burnt before, treating everything equally (but actually having my ex not pay his half & I end up covering everything) & then having to start over from scratch & build myself up again, despite my current partner being a million miles away from the type my ex was we both feel it is fair & best to recognise our investments.  We will share bills going forward equally. It is just our property shares that will be identified. This is also to cover the fact that should he die first I won’t end up paying inheritance tax on a share of a property that is actually mine. It isn’t just recognising the shares for a potential future break up. 
  • Fairness is relative and depends on the couple, previous and current arrangements and each party’s salary etc.
    That said, there are 4 ways I can see to do this:
    1. He pays Stamp duty you pay all costs associated with selling “your” property
    2. He pays the “extra” 3% stamp duty, you pay selling costs and you both split the “normal” stamp duty and legal fees
    3. Split everything 50:50
    4. Split everything in the ratio of your deposit for the new property
  • I agree with newdriver101 above regarding the options available to you.
    My partner and I have been together 13 years and still have some separation in our finances due to various reasons hence I do not agree with the views that it isn't a committed a relationship if you don't share everything 50/50. 
    Similarly to you OP my partner had a house he bought and is now a buy to let before he met me, that, in my opinion is his house, he deals with all the finances related to it and I wouldn't expect money from it. Conversely I am in the process of selling land for building, land I inherited, should i split that 50/50 with him - there is no chance on this Earth I would do that and nor would he expect me to. Don't get me wrong I may well end up mostly funding a new home for us but that is my choice and will be my house for us both to live in mortgage free. 
    That said I think it is easier to maintain separate finances when you both have something and are thus equal to some degree, it becomes more difficult when 1 partner doesn't and hence if there was a separation could easily lose out. 
    Been around since 2008 but somehow my profile was deleted!!!
  • avawat20
    avawat20 Posts: 159 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 1 November 2020 at 3:33PM
    Whatever way, make sure you get a deed of trust drawn up. Speak to the solicitor about how it can work - can you agree to take what you put in should you split and sell i.e. all of your house equity. I've not done one but buying house with partner and will be creating one! But we will have different levels of equity from our properties we sell.

    I would either split everything (put you on the flat too) or work out a way of him paying stamp duty from his property and you keeping your equity if things go sour.

    Hopefully that never happens but best to protect yourself - you never know what can happen!
  • Aranyani
    Aranyani Posts: 817 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper
    If the BTL is a nest egg for both of you then what is the plan for getting the ownership changed to reflect that?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.