We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Serious building defects after purchase of lease hold flat
Comments
-
the TA 7 says:Please read the notes on TA6 Property Information FormThe TA6 says:Instructions to seller:If you later become aware of any information which would alter any replies you have given, you must inform your solicitor immediately. This is as important as giving the right answers in the first place. Do not change any arrangements concerning the property with anyone (such as a tenant or neighbour) without first consulting your solicitor.If you can prove that the eller knew of the planned works when completing the TA6 or 7, or became aware of them after completing the form but befoe Exchange, yo may have a case against the seller. But how do you prove that they received the notifications....More relevant is probably the survey report. Given the very significant publicity around Grenfell Towers and cladding, if cadding is indeed the issue here, your survey report should have commented on it.0
-
greatcrested said:More relevant is probably the survey report. Given the very significant publicity around Grenfell Towers and cladding, if cadding is indeed the issue here, your survey report should have commented on it.
Needless to say if it was me I would certainly have picked up on the fact that most of the paperwork supplied to her conveyancer relates to a previous purchase that fell through in June / July, I really cannot believe this was provided and simply accepted by all concerned.
Without doubt the sellers would have been made aware of the issue as it was sent via email and letter yet they failed to disclose it. I accept proving it may difficult but based on the balance of probabilities there surely must be a case for recourse.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards