We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING:
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour.
Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Building control consultant
I rang building control regarding some issues on a house we are in the process of purchasing and I have posted about before.
The gist she gave me was that if work is 5 years old things are unenforceable and they wouldn't do anything. If I wanted regularisation I am basically taking my chances and was up to me. They could come and need to do some invasive things and may still be no.
She said the chance of the conservatory that has been integrated into the main kitchen/lounge passing is pretty slim due to energy loss, even if there is a tiled roof and it's not fully glazed.
My question is, are there such a thing as building control consultants who you can pay privately to come and see. Maybe ones that work for councils but do private advice on the side?
Comments
-
What are you looking for from them?0
-
So is it 5 years old or not? If it is, what is your concern?
If it's not, ask the vendor for an indemnity if it concerns you.
No free lunch, and no free laptop
0 -
You'd be best just to deal with the property on its merits e.g. do you actually want to improve the energy efficiency? There's not much point in making something retrospectively compliant with building regulations just for the sake of it.
1 -
If the conservatory has no external-grade doors between it and the house, then your issue is not whether it got signed off 5yrs ago or not... it's the fact that it's going to suck all the heat out of the room it's attached to.
So fit some doors.
But, of course, that then splits the room into two, and people don't like that and it's not why the wanted a conservatory in the first place, so they leave the doors open anyway...0 -
Thanks all,
I was thinking about when we come to sell it, it may make things easier. We will hopefully be there 20 years.
I did ask her about extending on the back but she said planning would advise on that and then building control would come and look at the new work.
Yes you are correct about putting doors in to make it more energy efficient would separate it unacceptably for us.
We are thinking of doing a loft maybe wrapped up with a single story extension at the back so our structural engineer said the beams used to do the knock through are fine for as it is but probably not for a loft room so may need replacing or some calculations to spread the weight another way.
In any event that will be a question for another day!
Thanks for your replies, settled my need to get boxes ticked
0 -
By then the works will be a quarter of a century old, and building regulations will have moved on to require other things. Nobody will care whether or not it would have ticked the correct boxes when it was originally done.TheProfessional said:I was thinking about when we come to sell it, it may make things easier. We will hopefully be there 20 years.
0 -
The doors aren't just there for "energy efficiency" - they are required for BR compliance and sign-off.
When you come to sell it, 25yrs after it was built, nobody will give the first toss about quarter-century-old paperwork. And that's assuming the conservatory is still there in its current form.0 -
In 20 years your conservatory will again be non-compliant beacause the visutrons will not have been sourced from a sustainable elengated moon-based troffle.
2 -
Haha
I think issues like this just seem stressful as it gets thrown up during what is a stressful process anyway.
We have managed to live in our current house for 6 years which was built 130 years ago and I imagine things like our super steep stairs etc wouldn't pass regs now!0 -
The BR compliance element is to meet energy efficiency guidelines. By keeping the existing thermal envelope of the house, it allows the conservatory to not meet building regs for energy efficiency. 😉AdrianC said:The doors aren't just there for "energy efficiency" - they are required for BR compliance and sign-off.
When you come to sell it, 25yrs after it was built, nobody will give the first toss about quarter-century-old paperwork. And that's assuming the conservatory is still there in its current form.
OP, much has already been said, but if you are planning upgrades then upgrade anything you're not currently happy with as part of that process and get building control approval for that element at the time. It effectively ends up getting the non compliant thing passed if you word it properly 🤫
Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
