We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
First time Stocks&Shares ISA and fund allocation question
Blue Whale Growth Acc - 30%
Lindsell Train Global Equities - 30%
Fidelity Total Bond Fund - 30%
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund - 10%
Is this enough diversification or am I trying to cover too much here?
Comments
-
You only need one global equity index fund and hey presto, you have maximum ultimate diversification.
Whether or not your two active funds (blue whale and lindsell train) are a good buy is something only time will tell. What I do know is that blue whale seem to have a lot of cash to spend on marketing. Lindsell Train is fine - cheap, decent not too bullshitty manager, good businesses.
The bond fund will likely do worse than cash over the next decade or so, especially if you take fund and platform charges into account.1 -
You have good diversification ('maximum ultimate' diversification is practically impossible to achieve as this would surely involve owning every company?) within equities not within assest classes (e.g. property, gold, bonds of various types)Another_Saver said:You only need one global equity index fund and hey presto, you have maximum ultimate diversification.1 -
Just a bit of hyperbole, the L&G index fund owns almost every public company, so it's maximum diversification within the investable universe.grumiofoundation said:
You have good diversification ('maximum ultimate' diversification is practically impossible to achieve as this would surely involve owning every company?) within equities not within assest classes (e.g. property, gold, bonds of various types)Another_Saver said:You only need one global equity index fund and hey presto, you have maximum ultimate diversification.
Buying other assets is asset allocation, diversification would be buying a diversified portfolio of commodities, bonds and property within those asset classes.
1 -
Another_Saver said:
Thank you. In various advisory sites, beginner investors are often advised to have some bond allocation in their investments. My initial plan actually did not include the bond fund until I read those. Would it be highly risky to be investing 100% in equities?You only need one global equity index fund and hey presto, you have maximum ultimate diversification.
Whether or not your two active funds (blue whale and lindsell train) are a good buy is something only time will tell. What I do know is that blue whale seem to have a lot of cash to spend on marketing. Lindsell Train is fine - cheap, decent not too bullshitty manager, good businesses.
The bond fund will likely do worse than cash over the next decade or so, especially if you take fund and platform charges into account.
0 -
Completely newbie in investing here - sorry for not clarifying! When I was thinking of diversification, I was thinking of equities - region and sector diversification. As mentioned in the previous post, the decision to allocate some of that ISA to a bond fund was because I read too many sites.Another_Saver said:
Just a bit of hyperbole, the L&G index fund owns almost every public company, so it's maximum diversification within the investable universe.grumiofoundation said:
You have good diversification ('maximum ultimate' diversification is practically impossible to achieve as this would surely involve owning every company?) within equities not within assest classes (e.g. property, gold, bonds of various types)Another_Saver said:You only need one global equity index fund and hey presto, you have maximum ultimate diversification.
Buying other assets is asset allocation, diversification would be buying a diversified portfolio of commodities, bonds and property within those asset classes.0 -
In various advisory sites, beginner investors are often advised to have some bond allocation in their investments.
It is highly unlikely an advisory site would advise asset allocations without getting sufficient information to give out advice. Do not interpret information and opinion as advice.
Knowledge and behaviour is certainly something to take into account when deciding asset allocation. However, attitude to risk and capacity for loss are also other things.
Would it be highly risky to be investing 100% in equities?Depends on your behaviour, knowledge, attitude to risk and capacity for loss. It also depends on the type of equities.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.3 -
Bonds have typically been seen as a "safer" investment which comes with lower annual gains but acts as a protection on your portfolio in the event of a *stock* market crash. More bonds = less volatility, (in both directions).
However that assumes bonds don't crash in tandem. Historically the correlation is negative, but if we end up in a high inflation / high interest rate world in the next few years, then there's every chance that bonds could start to sell off rapidly like stocks.
Personally I'm not keen on bonds given ultra low interest rates at the moment. Upside potential is small, downsize potential is large. I'd rather hedge stocks with gold whilst the opportunity cost is low.3 -
Personally I'm not keen on bonds given ultra low interest rates at the moment. Upside potential is small, downsize potential is large. I'd rather hedge stocks with gold whilst the opportunity cost is low.
This view is reflected in a number of the fluid asset allocation models where cash and gilts are being used for risk reduction on corp bonds are sitting at zero allocations except for the higher risk end of the scale where some may offer upside but with risk comparable to equities.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
You should not look at your S&S Isa portfolio in isolation .
For example 100% equities in a £40K S&S ISA , would be less risky overall if you separately had £100K in a cash savings account .
Also depending on the type of pension you have this could also be already invested in a certain % of equities , bonds etc .
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards