We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Investing in Europe
Comments
-
Sounds a mish mash of a portfolio with no real foundation.aroominyork said:
But it needn't be for diversification - it might be to make up the weight. My core index is Fidelity Index World (developed world only) as about 40% of my equities, then I add a few actives like emerging markets/AP, UK smaller companies, some Fundsmith/Smithson, and end up underweight Europe. So I can remain underweight or plug the gap... and that's where I end up in the conundrum. But it's less than 5% of my equities so it's not going to make or break either way.Thrugelmir said:"Europe" as a grouping is a mixed bag of companies and economies. Intel's market capitalisation is bigger than Portugal's annual GDP. If you've a core large passive global fund little point in adding a huge number of additional European stocks for diversification. As will most likely have minimal impact on overall portfolio performance.0 -
Why, Thrugelmir? An index foundation, add actives for emerging markets and small/mid caps, and some Terry who I like. What's wrong with that?1
-
one man's meat is another man's poison
as long as it's making money for you and fits your strategy, i've seen far worse on here"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
For example, all the holdings in Fundsmith will already be in your global fund. Likewise majority of those in emerging markets funds. Might as well increase your global allocation and pay less fees.aroominyork said:Why, Thrugelmir? An index foundation, add actives for emerging markets and small/mid caps, and some Terry who I like. What's wrong with that?0 -
Yes, all the companies in active funds will also be in passive funds, but not necessarily in the same proportions. (RIP Eric Morecambe.)Thrugelmir said:
For example, all the holdings in Fundsmith will already be in your global fund. Likewise majority of those in emerging markets funds. Might as well increase your global allocation and pay less fees.aroominyork said:Why, Thrugelmir? An index foundation, add actives for emerging markets and small/mid caps, and some Terry who I like. What's wrong with that?0 -
Ooh hitting me right in the nostalgiaaroominyork said:
Yes, all the companies in active funds will also be in passive funds, but not necessarily in the same proportions. (RIP Eric Morecambe.)Thrugelmir said:
For example, all the holdings in Fundsmith will already be in your global fund. Likewise majority of those in emerging markets funds. Might as well increase your global allocation and pay less fees.aroominyork said:Why, Thrugelmir? An index foundation, add actives for emerging markets and small/mid caps, and some Terry who I like. What's wrong with that?1 -
Have you considered building your portfolio by sectors / themes rather than regions to avoid duplication.aroominyork said:
Yes, all the companies in active funds will also be in passive funds, but not necessarily in the same proportions. (RIP Eric Morecambe.)Thrugelmir said:
For example, all the holdings in Fundsmith will already be in your global fund. Likewise majority of those in emerging markets funds. Might as well increase your global allocation and pay less fees.aroominyork said:Why, Thrugelmir? An index foundation, add actives for emerging markets and small/mid caps, and some Terry who I like. What's wrong with that?0 -
Good question. My starting point isn't sectors but I'm aware of the main themes of my active funds (eg healthcare, tech, consumer staples for Fundsmith) so I have a light touch feel for whether I am over-duplicating.Thrugelmir said:
Have you considered building your portfolio by sectors / themes rather than regions to avoid duplication.aroominyork said:
Yes, all the companies in active funds will also be in passive funds, but not necessarily in the same proportions. (RIP Eric Morecambe.)Thrugelmir said:
For example, all the holdings in Fundsmith will already be in your global fund. Likewise majority of those in emerging markets funds. Might as well increase your global allocation and pay less fees.aroominyork said:Why, Thrugelmir? An index foundation, add actives for emerging markets and small/mid caps, and some Terry who I like. What's wrong with that?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
