We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
What is the best investment option for 87 year old?



Comments
-
At her age why not hold more cash?0
-
I agree - the latest statement says that only £1,381 is cash
0 -
At her age, I'd drawdown the lot & either enjoy it while you can, or give a sizable chunk to grandkids.
Could lose the lot if need to go into care2 -
As far as the charges are concerned that is around £87 a month, or £1050 a year. On 80 grand works out around 1.3%. if that is for active fund charges and platform, not a bad deal at all, if passive funds maybe a bit high. The allocation of assets is another matter, at 87 I would not have a lot in equities that could fall 50% tomorrow.1
-
I have just seen her recent statements and was surprised/annoyed to see that each month she is being charged 1) £19.20 to the wealth management service, 2) £46.89 to the Advisor and 3) £21.43 in Discretionary Fund Manager Charges. Am I wrong in thinking that this fund and these charges are not appropriate for someone of her age?
Yes you are wrong. The charges seem reasonable. Although there is some confusion in your charges. There is no wealth management service with FEI Hybrid portfolios. Maybe you are misreading something. You would expect
a platform charge, adviser charge, DFM charge and OCF of the funds (and to comply with the EU directive MiFIDII you would also have TC and IC but most people ignore those)
Why are you annoyed or surprised at something completely normal?
On 80 grand works out around 1.3%. if that is for active fund charges and platform, not a bad deal at all, if passive funds maybe a bit high.The FEI Hybrid portfolio is a quarterly rebalanced portfolio with fluid asset allocation (i.e. it is updated quarterly and not just back to a rigid allocation) and is made up of passive and active funds. The medium bit indicates that the weightings are not on a long term basis but medium term (7-15 years range) and risk 3 would put it around 60% equities.
The allocation of assets is another matter, at 87 I would not have a lot in equities that could fall 50% tomorrow.When it comes it age, it is really down to the individual. An investor for many decades would likely continue investing up to date of death. Whereas a cash saver who has never invested money shouldn't be going near investments at age 87. Ability to understand, past experience, health and more can come into play.
She is likely to want to drawdown 5% - 10% of this fund from next year and I wondered what (other than a savings account) would be the lowest cost & safest investment option?There is no safe option with her objective.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2 -
Overall there does not seem to be much of a problem - you are being charged for a service . If you did it yourself ( without an IFA) but with a similar fund you probably would not be far off 1 %.
She might want to talk to her IFA about reducing the risk level now she is 87 .0 -
..at that age I would forget about any investments, withdraw all the money and put it into the best savings account you can find and then draw it down to suit their needs...
.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."0 -
Stubod said:..at that age I would forget about any investments, withdraw all the money and put it into the best savings account you can find and then draw it down to suit their needs...
This is the problem with trying to give the OP an answer as there is insufficient information to go on. Plus, you have people with different views that may or may not be suitable for the scenario that the OP has not given us.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.3 -
dunstonh said:Stubod said:..at that age I would forget about any investments, withdraw all the money and put it into the best savings account you can find and then draw it down to suit their needs...
This is the problem with trying to give the OP an answer as there is insufficient information to go on. Plus, you have people with different views that may or may not be suitable for the scenario that the OP has not given us.
.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."0 -
At the age of 87, it should be "spend, spend, spend".
Does she have income in addition to the lump sum.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards