We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Active Vs passive Global index trackers

2»

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 16 October 2020 at 11:16PM
    ALLIANZ TECHNOLOGY TRUST PLC (ATT) is a better consistent performer over the past 5 years. Doesn't make the headlines though. A lot rests on ones personal view of Tesla, which certainly divides opinion. 


  • Stargunner
    Stargunner Posts: 1,097 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you are saying the only reason that SMT has performed so well is because of Tesla why is it’s performance over 10 years so good {better than ATT as well} when Tesla’s share price was stagnant up until about 2 years ago
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    edited 17 October 2020 at 9:53AM
    If you are saying the only reason that SMT has performed so well is because of Tesla why is it’s performance over 10 years so good {better than ATT as well} when Tesla’s share price was stagnant up until about 2 years ago
    No denying its 10 year performance is great. However, you can see it was particularly great in the last couple of years, which is part of how it got the stunning 10 year return.

    For example, with a chart starting 10 years ago, over the first five years it would have turned £1000 into ~£2000 (doubling in five years); then the next three years it would have turned the ~£2000 into ~£4500 (more than doubling in only three years); then the next two years it turned the ~£4500 into just over £9000 (doubling in only two years)

    The fact that SMT is better than ATT *after* 10 years does not mean it was better than ATT *for* 10 years. If you look at a chart starting 16 Oct 2010, they were neck and neck for the first seven years, but due to the different portfolio mix, by end of July 2019, ATT was at +500% while SMT was 'only' about +380% (from eyeballing a chart, not exact). Then all of a sudden 15 months later, SMT has caught up that deficit to end the ten-year period +828% while ATT is at +810%.

    That 15 months period is one in which their largest holding, Tesla has gone from being worth $46 a share to $427 a share. No surprise that they had a storming result for the period when combined with the other solid performances of high tech growth companies into and beyond the initial pandemic market shock. But it's certainly valid to say as Thrugelmir did, a lot rests on a "view of Tesla, which certainly divides opinion". 

    And it doesn't make any sense to say 'if it's only because of Tesla, why is it so good over 10 years better than ATT as well' ; if SMT had done its own thing with £1000 from 16 October 2010 to 31 July 2019 and then copied the exact same 'low Tesla' portfolio as ATT at that point (and simply growing ~50% over the remaining 14-15 months of the decade), SMT would have ended the 10 year period with its July 2019 £4800 growing to £7300 to while ATT's July 2019 £6000 turned into £9100. 

    But due in part to its 'high Tesla' portfolio it didn't grow £4800 to £7300, it instead grew £4800 to £9276.  That late surge of performance boost made it 'win' after 10 years despite having 'lost' after the first 8.75.   It produced an overall return of 9.28x whereas if it had done exactly what it did for the first 8.75 years and then copied ATT for the last 1.25 years, it would have made only 7.3x to ATT's 9.1x.

    Of course nobody is complaining of a 9x result or a 7x result or a 5x result after ten years - these are great returns.

    And while Allianz is aiming to be a tech fund, and doing a good job of it, SMT is more of a 'general high growth opportunities'  fund that happens to see a lot of opportunities in tech-driven sectors, and doing a good job of it.  So they are not direct competitors, but they are of course competing for the same global pool of investors.



  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,428 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    That's the sort of graph that freightens the investing bejeezus out of me.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • Stargunner
    Stargunner Posts: 1,097 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 17 October 2020 at 10:35AM
    I don’t think that it was just Tesla that had such an effect on SMT’s recent performance. If Tesla had of consisted of 5% of SMT’s portfolio at the beginning, although Tesla’s share price has gone up 9 fold that would only contribute 45% to SMT’s performance . I know that due to Tesla’s performance that SMT sold a big chunk of it in August because it had got too big in its portfolio. But I agree that both have performed exceptionally well and I am glad that I have been invested in both.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.