📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Maintenance payments and inheritance

Hi,
I’ve recently inherited some money from my late fathers estate, the amount is under the inheritance tax threshold, will this inheritance be calculated/included with my salary in my child maintenance payments for the next financial year?

Thanks

Comments

  • pphillips
    pphillips Posts: 1,631 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    This post is a duplicate from the Child Support forum.
  • Yes, I wasn’t sure which forum would be best to post in as my issue is relevant to both
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    No it’s not taxable income and therefore not counted.

    generally just assume it’s the opposite of what Ask says...
  • I was hoping there would be someone who is or has been in a similar position to me, the advice on the gov website is a little vague.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I was hoping there would be someone who is or has been in a similar position to me, the advice on the gov website is a little vague.
    I literally answered your question... :)
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The inheritance isn't income, so won't be counted.
    Any interest you earn on the money you inherit is income and would be counted.
    If you have outstanding arrears  then it is possible that the inheritance would be relevant to those.
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • Comms69 said:
    No it’s not taxable income and therefore not counted.

    generally just assume it’s the opposite of what Ask says...
    If you look at the government website (as highlighted by Askask), it does state that assets - including gold - would be taken into account as part of the child maintenance calculation.
    The reason that this worries me - in the context of the OP, is that gold does not generally produce any income (other than any gain made if you sell it).... And the government website doesn't say anything about taking your assets to pay for arrears.... (which would be logical and not unreasonable).....  It actually states that ownership of gold would be taken into account when assessing the maintenance payable.

    I appreciate that sometimes the government fail to quality control their websites - but I'm not sure that this woolly & vague information isn't deliberately so?

    It's an important question to get the right answer to.

    My gut feeling is that it's right to take into account any taxable income from the asset but not to target the underlying asset... But absolute clarity is essential here.

    I think you're right, but the wording / phrasing on the government website is ambiguous. 
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 21,015 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Comms69 said:
    No it’s not taxable income and therefore not counted.

    generally just assume it’s the opposite of what Ask says...
    If you look at the government website (as highlighted by Askask), it does state that assets - including gold - would be taken into account as part of the child maintenance calculation.
    The reason that this worries me - in the context of the OP, is that gold does not generally produce any income (other than any gain made if you sell it).... And the government website doesn't say anything about taking your assets to pay for arrears.... (which would be logical and not unreasonable).....  It actually states that ownership of gold would be taken into account when assessing the maintenance payable.

    I appreciate that sometimes the government fail to quality control their websites - but I'm not sure that this woolly & vague information isn't deliberately so?

    It's an important question to get the right answer to.

    My gut feeling is that it's right to take into account any taxable income from the asset but not to target the underlying asset... But absolute clarity is essential here.

    I think you're right, but the wording / phrasing on the government website is ambiguous. 
    Just another poorly written U.K. gov web page. It clearly states income then lists something that does not generate income (unless you happen to be a bullion dealer) 


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.