We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bank Harrassing By Phone
Options
Comments
-
Hi Becca,
Your call for advice has certainly stirred an interesting debate.
However, the fact remains that in my case, and clearly, in others, the letters DID work and the call stopped. So, whatever the correct interpretation of the laws and guidelines, it's worth trying it.DFW Nerd # 768 - PROUD TO BE DEALING WITH MY DEBTS :cool:0 -
Hi. You may not be aware (CCCS should have told you) but HBOS have changed their policy re DMP customers. They will freeze interest for 12 months and then restart it. After approx 3 months they will pass your debt to Blair, Oliver & Scott who will then freeze interest.
This has happened to me - BO&S are ok - they actually send you regular statements and as long as you keep making payments, all they need is a budget review every year and they're happy.All comments made and advice given are my own opinions and do not represent the views or advice of any debt advice organisation.
Current balance: approx £17500 including Tax Credit Overpayment
Estimated DFD: never - deficit budget. Cheers HMRC! :mad:
Another year over and we're still together. It's not always easy, but I'm here forever0 -
Hi Becca,
Your call for advice has certainly stirred an interesting debate.
However, the fact remains that in my case, and clearly, in others, the letters DID work and the call stopped. So, whatever the correct interpretation of the laws and guidelines, it's worth trying it.
This is actually a very good point, whilst it may not be appropriate to quote incorrect legislation or guidelines there is nothing to stop anyone from asking for contact to only be made in writing.0 -
CCCS_Emily wrote: »You can mention the OFT guideline as they are relevant, as Rog_2 says the interpretation of these guidelines buy the person receiving the calls is equally as valid. So, if the calls are interpreted as harassment this is good enough reason to request that the calls are stopped and the telephone number is either removed or stopped being used.
cccs say they are are relevant and correct (although subjective), and they seem a bit more trustworthy0 -
Try something like this letter to the bank.
The date
Your name
Your address
Dear
Re: account number / agreement number
I am writing to express my serious concerns regarding the telephone calls that I have received from your company.
I am now formally requesting that all further correspondence be made in writing only.
I demand that these phone calls stop immediately. I am familiar with the terms of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1970 and I believe your harassment places you in breach of these acts.
If you continue to call, you will also be in breach of the Wireless Telegraphy Act (1949) and, as such, I will report you to both Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading.
Take further note that continued telephone calls after the receipt of a request not to call may constitute a criminal offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.
You will be deemed to have been served notice of my request and I will deem it served by (FULL DATE), I am advising you that any calls received after this date will be recorded with the intention of them being used as evidence.
Yours faithfully,BSCno.87The only stupid question is an unasked oneLoving life as a Kernow Hippy0 -
put the dpa request bit in as suggested by cccs as well
not sure about the wireless telegraphy bit? never seen that on letters before
the rest is very similar to the letters that worked like a charm for me0 -
CCCS_Emily wrote: »I will investigate the DPA rule as I still do not think that would apply - you can't give your permission at the time of application then withdraw it when the mood suits you.
Basically you are asking the creditor to stop using your telephone number because they are abusing the information by using it to harass you. A telephone number is not essential information for the contract with the creditor to continue and you are withdrawing your consent for them to use it.
The links below are a good guide for how to go about putting together a letter to the creditor requesting they stop calling. You can mention the OFT guideline as they are relevant, as Rog_2 says the interpretation of these guidelines buy the person receiving the calls is equally as valid. So, if the calls are interpreted as harassment this is good enough reason to request that the calls are stopped and the telephone number is either removed or stopped being used.
http://www.ico.gov.uk/Home/what_we_cover/data_protection/your_rights/preventing_processing_of_information.aspx
http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/how_can_i_stop_them_processing_my_personal_information.pdf
I do not think you are considering this through to it's logical conclusion. Leave aside the DPA for one moment and focus on the OFt guidleines and Harrassment. We agree that this is very subjective so for anyone considering this course of action they have to prove 'beyong reasonable doubt' that harrassment has occured. It is not sufficient to simply state to a court that you think it was too much, the lender can simply turn around and state that they don't think it is. What substantive proof can you provide to prove your case ?- it may come in the form of phone records that clearly show 75 calls were made in one day but without it you cannot proceed at all therefore quoting it unless you have proof is pointless.
Now back to the DPA; both links you have provided do not cover this situation. In fact on page 6 of your second link it even states 'section 10 will not apply when the processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which you are a party.' Please let me know if you think there are other relevant sections of the legislation that you think apply in this case. I suspect that it will always boil down to the interpretation of the law again so there will always be a burden of proof on the claimant.
So I stand by all my comments so far. You can request that creditors stop calling you but you cannot enforce it using the guidelines or law.0 -
mine had something similar to another letter i just found here
maybe put in instead
Your telephone calls are in breach of the Office of Fair Trading guidelines. If you continue with them after the receipt of this letter, an official complaint, together with a log recording the times and frequency will be passed both to that office and to Trading Standards,0 -
beccabooboo
tootsie is trying to mislead you, so i would trust cccs
i think they have slightly more idea what they are on about:p0 -
Tootsie_Roll wrote: »You can request that creditors stop calling you but you cannot enforce it using the guidelines or law.
Fortunately, T Roll, you can indeed use the law to ensure that creditors stop 'harrassing' you.I am NOT, nor do I profess to be, a Qualified Debt Adviser. I have made MANY mistakes and have OFTEN been the unwitting victim of the the shamefull tactics of the Financial Industry.
If any of my experiences, or the knowledge that I have gained from those experiences, can help anyone who finds themselves in similar circumstances, then my experiences have not been in vain.
HMRC Bankruptcy Statistic - 26th October 2006 - 23rd April 2007 BCSC Member No. 7
DFW Nerd # 166 PROUD TO BE DEALING WITH MY DEBTS0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards