We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Does mortgage down valuation matter?
chozza
Posts: 9 Forumite
Hi,
I'm in the process of buying a property, and the lender HSBC has given a valuation significantly lower than the agreed sale price. I have 50% LTV so I don't believe this is the issue. I also know that they haven't visited the property so would have been a desktop valuation.
It was on the market for 325k, sale agreed at 265k, and HSBC have valued it at 210k! The broker agreed that they've clearly made a mistake, as even a quick search on sales in the area show an absolute minimum of 240k for similar properties. Just to provide some perspective, I sold my house very close by for 220k, and it was 50% smaller and significantly less desirable for various reasons (no off road parking, tiny garden etc.)
I am almost certain the price i've agreed is a very good price (having done quite a lot of research), and the broker have said I can appeal the valuation, however there is no guarantee they'll re-value it, and by all accounts it's quite rare they do.
So my question is, does the mortgage valuation really matter for me when I come to resell it and should I be bothered?
Many thanks!
I'm in the process of buying a property, and the lender HSBC has given a valuation significantly lower than the agreed sale price. I have 50% LTV so I don't believe this is the issue. I also know that they haven't visited the property so would have been a desktop valuation.
It was on the market for 325k, sale agreed at 265k, and HSBC have valued it at 210k! The broker agreed that they've clearly made a mistake, as even a quick search on sales in the area show an absolute minimum of 240k for similar properties. Just to provide some perspective, I sold my house very close by for 220k, and it was 50% smaller and significantly less desirable for various reasons (no off road parking, tiny garden etc.)
I am almost certain the price i've agreed is a very good price (having done quite a lot of research), and the broker have said I can appeal the valuation, however there is no guarantee they'll re-value it, and by all accounts it's quite rare they do.
So my question is, does the mortgage valuation really matter for me when I come to resell it and should I be bothered?
Many thanks!
0
Comments
-
I think the issue is not the resale but the mortgage offer.if you agreed to buy at 265k and have a 50% LTV it means you are borrowing 133k ish.if HSBC value it at 210k but the vendor still wants 265K then you put in your full 133k deposit, HSBC will only give you 77k mortgage and you will have to find the 55k yourself.if HSBC value it at 210k and you only use 105K of your deposit to keep your 50% LTV then you still have to find the extra 55k yourself.That is my understandingBut the vendor may meet you half way as if your mortagage company valvued it as 210k then so might many others.1
-
It's common in this kind of situation to see if the seller can reduce the price at all, alongside appealing the valuation...0
-
Or it means you are borrowing £133k at about 63% LTV - which the lender may be happy with - what is the LTV of the product you are applying for?jennyred said:I think the issue is not the resale but the mortgage offer.if you agreed to buy at 265k and have a 50% LTV it means you are borrowing 133k ish.if HSBC value it at 210k but the vendor still wants 265K then you put in your full 133k deposit, HSBC will only give you 77k mortgage and you will have to find the 55k yourself.if HSBC value it at 210k and you only use 105K of your deposit to keep your 50% LTV then you still have to find the extra 55k yourself.That is my understandingBut the vendor may meet you half way as if your mortagage company valvued it as 210k then so might many others.
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll1 -
The valuation is ONLY for your lender to see what they think the property's worth as security on your mortgage.chozza said:I'm in the process of buying a property, and the lender HSBC has given a valuation significantly lower than the agreed sale price. I have 50% LTV so I don't believe this is the issue. I also know that they haven't visited the property so would have been a desktop valuation.
It was on the market for 325k, sale agreed at 265k, and HSBC have valued it at 210k! The broker agreed that they've clearly made a mistake, as even a quick search on sales in the area show an absolute minimum of 240k for similar properties. Just to provide some perspective, I sold my house very close by for 220k, and it was 50% smaller and significantly less desirable for various reasons (no off road parking, tiny garden etc.)
I am almost certain the price i've agreed is a very good price (having done quite a lot of research), and the broker have said I can appeal the valuation, however there is no guarantee they'll re-value it, and by all accounts it's quite rare they do.
So my question is, does the mortgage valuation really matter for me when I come to resell it and should I be bothered?
You're paying £265k, and borrowing £132.5k. You think that's 50% LtV. They think it's 63% LtV against £210k-worth of security.
That's it. End of.
Does 63% vs 50% make a difference to the rate you can borrow at? It certainly won't make the lender walk away...0 -
No, the deal they are offering is still exactly the same. In which case should I bother attempting to appeal it? My only concern is that the valuation may somehow affect the future sale price, although I'm not sure how.AdrianC said:
The valuation is ONLY for your lender to see what they think the property's worth as security on your mortgage.chozza said:I'm in the process of buying a property, and the lender HSBC has given a valuation significantly lower than the agreed sale price. I have 50% LTV so I don't believe this is the issue. I also know that they haven't visited the property so would have been a desktop valuation.
It was on the market for 325k, sale agreed at 265k, and HSBC have valued it at 210k! The broker agreed that they've clearly made a mistake, as even a quick search on sales in the area show an absolute minimum of 240k for similar properties. Just to provide some perspective, I sold my house very close by for 220k, and it was 50% smaller and significantly less desirable for various reasons (no off road parking, tiny garden etc.)
I am almost certain the price i've agreed is a very good price (having done quite a lot of research), and the broker have said I can appeal the valuation, however there is no guarantee they'll re-value it, and by all accounts it's quite rare they do.
So my question is, does the mortgage valuation really matter for me when I come to resell it and should I be bothered?
You're paying £265k, and borrowing £132.5k. You think that's 50% LtV. They think it's 63% LtV against £210k-worth of security.
That's it. End of.
Does 63% vs 50% make a difference to the rate you can borrow at? It certainly won't make the lender walk away...
Seems like you're saying their valuation is more for their purposes rather than what they think the property is accurately worth when trying to sell in normal conditions.
0 -
The original asking price was 325k, so I've already negotiated 60k off that. It would be a spectacularly brazen estate agent to value a property at 100k+ more than its actual value.letsbetfair said:It's common in this kind of situation to see if the seller can reduce the price at all, alongside appealing the valuation...0 -
My deposit is 150k and i'm borrowing 115k. Even with their valuation the deal they are offering is exactly the same. It feels like they're just down valuing it as a mitigation strategy for this uncertain market we're in.theoretica said:
Or it means you are borrowing £133k at about 63% LTV - which the lender may be happy with - what is the LTV of the product you are applying for?jennyred said:I think the issue is not the resale but the mortgage offer.if you agreed to buy at 265k and have a 50% LTV it means you are borrowing 133k ish.if HSBC value it at 210k but the vendor still wants 265K then you put in your full 133k deposit, HSBC will only give you 77k mortgage and you will have to find the 55k yourself.if HSBC value it at 210k and you only use 105K of your deposit to keep your 50% LTV then you still have to find the extra 55k yourself.That is my understandingBut the vendor may meet you half way as if your mortagage company valvued it as 210k then so might many others.0 -
Then there is absolutely no benefit in appealing it, since your appeal succeeding will make no difference whatsoever.chozza said:
No, the deal they are offering is still exactly the same. In which case should I bother attempting to appeal it?AdrianC said:
The valuation is ONLY for your lender to see what they think the property's worth as security on your mortgage.chozza said:I'm in the process of buying a property, and the lender HSBC has given a valuation significantly lower than the agreed sale price. I have 50% LTV so I don't believe this is the issue. I also know that they haven't visited the property so would have been a desktop valuation.
It was on the market for 325k, sale agreed at 265k, and HSBC have valued it at 210k! The broker agreed that they've clearly made a mistake, as even a quick search on sales in the area show an absolute minimum of 240k for similar properties. Just to provide some perspective, I sold my house very close by for 220k, and it was 50% smaller and significantly less desirable for various reasons (no off road parking, tiny garden etc.)
I am almost certain the price i've agreed is a very good price (having done quite a lot of research), and the broker have said I can appeal the valuation, however there is no guarantee they'll re-value it, and by all accounts it's quite rare they do.
So my question is, does the mortgage valuation really matter for me when I come to resell it and should I be bothered?
You're paying £265k, and borrowing £132.5k. You think that's 50% LtV. They think it's 63% LtV against £210k-worth of security.
That's it. End of.
Does 63% vs 50% make a difference to the rate you can borrow at? It certainly won't make the lender walk away...My only concern is that the valuation may somehow affect the future sale price, although I'm not sure how.
It can't. Nobody will even see it again. If ever you want to remortgage, a new valuation would be required.
Yes, people will see the actual sale price, because that's public info via the LR - but that doesn't affect what the house is worth in the future.Seems like you're saying their valuation is more for their purposes rather than what they think the property is accurately worth when trying to sell in normal conditions.
They're the same thing...
That's all the valuation is - the lender saying to the surveyor "So what do you think this house is worth, as you see it?". A downvaluation is just the surveyor saying "I think it's a bit pricey", so the lender base the loan-to-value on that. It doesn't mean you can't pay more if you want. It doesn't mean the house is any different to what you decided to pay £X for...
Why do the lender even care what it's worth? Because if you don't repay the mortgage, and they repossess, they're going to have to sell it. And what comes out of that sale may only partially repay your debt to them...
Remember, there's three different opinions as to the value - the vendor's opinion (the marketed price), your opinion (your offer), the surveyor's opinion (the valuation).0 -
So in this case, all they care is that if the property needed to be sold it would comfortable cover their loan - as you have such a large deposit they don't need a very accurate valuation for this and may have gone for a desk based valuation for that reason.AdrianC said:Why do the lender even care what it's worth? Because if you don't repay the mortgage, and they repossess, they're going to have to sell it. And what comes out of that sale may only partially repay your debt to them...
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
