We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tenants in Common but no contribution

13»

Comments

  • saschia said:
    My intention was as the letter I uploaded shows that he would NOT be entitled to the £130k deposit I put down and that we would each be entitled to the mortgage payments we had made back. However the solicitor did not do this as they claim they did not receive my letter, but an email trail I have proves they did as they acknowledged receipt of it. I can afford the mortgage in my own name too but I am tied in for the next 18 months.
    Your proposal in the letter is mathematically nonsensical. You put in the £130k deposit and he is to pay the £130k mortgage which would result in him paying a lot more than £130k over the term of the loan because of compound interest. Yet he was to get ALL the mortgage payments he’d made back and you were to get your £130k back. There could very well not have been enough equity to do that. 

    In any case what you agreed to by the time you completed the purchase was a 95/5 split as tenants in common. You get the raw end of the deal as the relationship broke down so quickly whereas in the future he’d have had the raw end of only being entitled to 5% of the equity. 

    Have you raised this with the solicitor involved in the purchase yet? 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.