We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
The old gold rule to do it by yourself
Comments
-
never heard of this "gold rule" before0
-
Thrugelmir said:
More specifically S&P 500 index funds. Always interesting how the spoken word progressively gains a reinterpretation as it passes through a number of hands.AnotherJoe said:
Yep, Buffet has publicly said that when he dies his wife should put 90% of the money in index funds and also had a bet a few years ago with a managed fund manager that over a 10 year period the index would beat the fund managers fund. He won the bet. (From memory the prize was $1M)Malthusian said:Buffet has said almost as many things that he never said as Winston Churchilll. "If you buy index trackers, it's a big mistake, if you buy funds, it's a minor big mistake" makes zero sense. Index trackers = funds, and that's just for starters. We're in not-even-wrong territory. Sometimes people post threads so others can correct their misconceptions and sometimes it's very difficult to make out what the misconceptions even are.There is no evidence that anyone can consistently beat the market. Most punters who try it, especially on the likes of Trading212 and HL, lose money.To the average American an S&P 500 fund is a global equity tracker. [/racism] The risk of the USA having a "lost decade" a la Japan was arguably unthinkable for much of Buffett's youth and middle age due to its significance in the global developed capitalist economy. With the fall of the Iron Curtain and the rise of Asia Pacific and emerging markets, that is no longer such a safe assumption.1 -
Looking back, certainly the easiest & gold rule is to buy iShares S&P ETF every month for 10 years, but how about from this point onward? post COVID-19, post Brexit...0
-
Ah yes, the old joke about army headquarters receiving a much relayed message from the front line; "send three and fourpence, we're going to a dance"Thrugelmir said:
More specifically S&P 500 index funds. Always interesting how the spoken word progressively gains a reinterpretation as it passes through a number of hands.AnotherJoe said:
Yep, Buffet has publicly said that when he dies his wife should put 90% of the money in index funds and also had a bet a few years ago with a managed fund manager that over a 10 year period the index would beat the fund managers fund. He won the bet. (From memory the prize was $1M)Malthusian said:Buffet has said almost as many things that he never said as Winston Churchilll. "If you buy index trackers, it's a big mistake, if you buy funds, it's a minor big mistake" makes zero sense. Index trackers = funds, and that's just for starters. We're in not-even-wrong territory. Sometimes people post threads so others can correct their misconceptions and sometimes it's very difficult to make out what the misconceptions even are.There is no evidence that anyone can consistently beat the market. Most punters who try it, especially on the likes of Trading212 and HL, lose money.
1 -
Seems highly unlikely the S&P 500 would be affected by a local issue in a much smaller country , like Brexit.veekking said:Looking back, certainly the easiest & gold rule is to buy iShares S&P ETF every month for 10 years, but how about from this point onward? post COVID-19, post Brexit...0 -
The 80's was a lost decade. S&P underperformed both inflation and cash. Buffet spent the end of the decade buying Coca Cola and cementing his reputation for posterity. Have to be both brave and conviction to hold 40% of your portfolio in a single a stock. Likewise who remembers when IBM (PC launch) and General Electric dominated the index.Malthusian said:Thrugelmir said:
More specifically S&P 500 index funds. Always interesting how the spoken word progressively gains a reinterpretation as it passes through a number of hands.AnotherJoe said:
Yep, Buffet has publicly said that when he dies his wife should put 90% of the money in index funds and also had a bet a few years ago with a managed fund manager that over a 10 year period the index would beat the fund managers fund. He won the bet. (From memory the prize was $1M)Malthusian said:Buffet has said almost as many things that he never said as Winston Churchilll. "If you buy index trackers, it's a big mistake, if you buy funds, it's a minor big mistake" makes zero sense. Index trackers = funds, and that's just for starters. We're in not-even-wrong territory. Sometimes people post threads so others can correct their misconceptions and sometimes it's very difficult to make out what the misconceptions even are.There is no evidence that anyone can consistently beat the market. Most punters who try it, especially on the likes of Trading212 and HL, lose money.To the average American an S&P 500 fund is a global equity tracker. [/racism] The risk of the USA having a "lost decade" a la Japan was arguably unthinkable for much of Buffett's youth and middle age due to its significance in the global developed capitalist economy. With the fall of the Iron Curtain and the rise of Asia Pacific and emerging markets, that is no longer such a safe assumption.1 -
Thrugelmir said:The 80's was a lost decade. S&P underperformed both inflation and cash.Where do you get that idea? $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 on January 1 1980 was $69,650 on January 1 1990. 3 times the rate of inflation over the period.Buffet spent the end of the decade buying Coca Cola and cementing his reputation for posterity. Have to be both brave and conviction to hold 40% of your portfolio in a single a stock.Indeed. Most of the managers who held 40% of their portfolio in a single stock dramatically underperformed the market, got fired / closed down / merged, and are long forgotten.
0 -
What's the point about the platform?Malthusian said:Buffet has said almost as many things that he never said as Winston Churchilll. "If you buy index trackers, it's a big mistake, if you buy funds, it's a minor big mistake" makes zero sense. Index trackers = funds, and that's just for starters. We're in not-even-wrong territory. Sometimes people post threads so others can correct their misconceptions and sometimes it's very difficult to make out what the misconceptions even are.There is no evidence that anyone can consistently beat the market. Most punters who try it, especially on the likes of Trading212 and HL, lose money.0 -
I think I recall that as well, the whole point is that in an index or fund, there are too many companies belonging to many different countries, very simple.AnotherJoe said:
Yep, Buffet has publicly said that when he dies his wife should put 90% of the money in index funds and also had a bet a few years ago with a managed fund manager that over a 10 year period the index would beat the fund managers fund. He won the bet. (From memory the prize was $1M)Malthusian said:Buffet has said almost as many things that he never said as Winston Churchilll. "If you buy index trackers, it's a big mistake, if you buy funds, it's a minor big mistake" makes zero sense. Index trackers = funds, and that's just for starters. We're in not-even-wrong territory. Sometimes people post threads so others can correct their misconceptions and sometimes it's very difficult to make out what the misconceptions even are.There is no evidence that anyone can consistently beat the market. Most punters who try it, especially on the likes of Trading212 and HL, lose money.
It's good if you keep an eye on them and see how the market moves, but if you are considering the correct index
, but if you really want to have a bit of control of your investments, you can do it only if you invest in few companies (20-40?).
Potentially, you may see more money loss with few companies than with a fund in a short time-FRAME, but are you gonna loose money in all these companies? Don't you think that any eventual loss will be easily balanced by all the other success?
Simple math.
Given that you have chosen the good ones, not garbage
0 -
I didn't ask for a competition between funds and indexes.AnotherJoe said:
Yep, Buffet has publicly said that when he dies his wife should put 90% of the money in index funds and also had a bet a few years ago with a managed fund manager that over a 10 year period the index would beat the fund managers fund. He won the bet. (From memory the prize was $1M)Malthusian said:Buffet has said almost as many things that he never said as Winston Churchilll. "If you buy index trackers, it's a big mistake, if you buy funds, it's a minor big mistake" makes zero sense. Index trackers = funds, and that's just for starters. We're in not-even-wrong territory. Sometimes people post threads so others can correct their misconceptions and sometimes it's very difficult to make out what the misconceptions even are.There is no evidence that anyone can consistently beat the market. Most punters who try it, especially on the likes of Trading212 and HL, lose money.
He suggested that to the wife probably because she just needs a stable income, and who cares, put the money there and enjoy, it's so simple at that level, who wants to bother with investments???0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

