We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Finding flaws to void claim
Comments
-
That could be very difficult to argue. Our neighbour's garage is built of asbestos sheet, not brick but it's still most definitely a garage.Sandtree said:I have known insurers to use both methods - deduction of additional premium or apply averaging based on premiums (rather than the more typical limits).
Though in this case its hard to see how you could accidentally mistake wood for brick unless this is a bit of a misdirection and the OP stated they kept it in a garage when in reality it was kept in a shed and the insurers are arguing the difference between a garage and a shed is construction materials.
0 -
It was only a supposition, we need to await the OP to clarify the details of the case,0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards