We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Brake pipe corroded and Front Suspension arm brush worn cost

Hi,

I gave my chevrolet spark 2012, 33k run for MOT,

I got below advisories

Nearside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))

Our mechanic gave a quote of £80 (labour + parts) for the brake pipe corrosion and £80 (parts alone) for the front suspension.

Are these prices true ? Will it cost so much ?
«1

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Pair of brake pipes for £80 doesn't seem too bad. He'll make the new pipes up from a roll of pipe and a couple of unions, so it's just labour to fit, then a few quid's worth of new fluid (when was it last changed?) and bleed through.

    Quick look at a random parts site suggests £40-50 for the arm, so £80 isn't the cheapest, but isn't ridiculous. Then maybe an hour's labour for that and then do the tracking.
  • Sounds very reasonable.
    Main dealership will charge you that just to read fault codes!
  • EssexExile
    EssexExile Posts: 6,533 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My old Astravan got advisories for corroded brake pipes for most of the 20 years I had it.
    Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.
  • Are the pipes corroded? Covered in grease ? Covered in other material?
  • I'd wait until it fails. Usually those brake pipe advisories mean a bit of surface rust or even just that the pipe has been protected with underseal or paint so the condition cannot be determined. The suspension arm  can wait.
  • RobM99
    RobM99 Posts: 2,763 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I'd say it sounds reasonable.
    Now a gainfully employed bassist again - WooHoo!
  • Scrapit
    Scrapit Posts: 2,304 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Hi,

    I gave my chevrolet spark 2012, 33k run for MOT,

    I got below advisories

    Nearside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
    Offside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
    Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))

    Our mechanic gave a quote of £80 (labour + parts) for the brake pipe corrosion and £80 (parts alone) for the front suspension.

    Are these prices true ? Will it cost so much ?
    Why would you need to "repair" the brake lines? The mot tester is just advising they are covered in something. It could be rust, road dirt or an anti rust treatment like waxoyl. If it aint broke dont fix it be MSE. Have a look your self and see what is covering them. You might choose to remove it with a wire brush or similar or even leave it until next year when you may get the same advice.
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 35,372 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    One of my cars had corroded brake pipe advisories in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 & 2015 eventually failing in 2016 after I had sold it.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Meanwhile, a friend had a brake pipe burst on the MOT ramp... having never had an advisory on it before.

    The MOT fail criteria is for a pipe to be corroded to two-thirds of its original wall thickness, having lost about 0.25mm. That's obviously impossible to measure in-situ with any degree of accuracy.
    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/mot-inspection-manual-for-private-passenger-and-light-commercial-vehicles/1-brakes#section-1-1-11
    So most testers will flag up anything that raises their eyebrows as grotty, reserving a fail for pipes that they really don't like the look of one bit.

    I think we can assume the mechanic that's quoted has seen the pipes in question.
  • Lomast
    Lomast Posts: 877 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Ever since I painted my steel brake pipes  I have had that advisory 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.