We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Voluntary temination of PCP
Comments
-
It’s unlikely to have an impact in the OP’s scenario as he is looking to take finance from a different provider and it sounds like he’s looking at main dealer finance so one would assume that his credit history would be relatively good.neilmcl said:
But as I mentioned in the first reply in this thread a VT marker will not have an adverse affect on the credit history, so what @lcc86 said is correct.bazzyb said:
Being allowed to do it doesn’t mean it won’t affect your credit file. If you VT an agreement it will definitely be marked as such, and will show on your credit history for six years.lcc86 said:OP in answer to your question, a VT should not affect your credit file as it's something you're allowed to do contractually.However saying in general terms that a VT will not affect somebody’s credit file is simply not true. It can (and does) affect lending decisions.0 -
It rarely does, and then only if you happen to be a repeat VTer. Think about what goes on the credit file, a marker saying a VT has taken place, which is totally legitimate, followed by a note stating the credit agreement has been settled. There's no black mark here, but I guess we can agree to disagree.bazzyb said:
It’s unlikely to have an impact in the OP’s scenario as he is looking to take finance from a different provider and it sounds like he’s looking at main dealer finance so one would assume that his credit history would be relatively good.neilmcl said:
But as I mentioned in the first reply in this thread a VT marker will not have an adverse affect on the credit history, so what @lcc86 said is correct.bazzyb said:
Being allowed to do it doesn’t mean it won’t affect your credit file. If you VT an agreement it will definitely be marked as such, and will show on your credit history for six years.lcc86 said:OP in answer to your question, a VT should not affect your credit file as it's something you're allowed to do contractually.However saying in general terms that a VT will not affect somebody’s credit file is simply not true. It can (and does) affect lending decisions.0 -
It's not just motor finance that access your credit file, though. Is BazzyB saying it will affect credit elsewhere?neilmcl said:
It rarely does, and then only if you happen to be a repeat VTer. Think about what goes on the credit file, a marker saying a VT has taken place, which is totally legitimate, followed by a note stating the credit agreement has been settled. There's no black mark here, but I guess we can agree to disagree.bazzyb said:
It’s unlikely to have an impact in the OP’s scenario as he is looking to take finance from a different provider and it sounds like he’s looking at main dealer finance so one would assume that his credit history would be relatively good.neilmcl said:
But as I mentioned in the first reply in this thread a VT marker will not have an adverse affect on the credit history, so what @lcc86 said is correct.bazzyb said:
Being allowed to do it doesn’t mean it won’t affect your credit file. If you VT an agreement it will definitely be marked as such, and will show on your credit history for six years.lcc86 said:OP in answer to your question, a VT should not affect your credit file as it's something you're allowed to do contractually.However saying in general terms that a VT will not affect somebody’s credit file is simply not true. It can (and does) affect lending decisions.0 -
I’d say very unlikely. Some motor finance providers will either decline or impose terms based on VT but I’m not aware that other lenders would do this.ontheroad1970 said:
It's not just motor finance that access your credit file, though. Is BazzyB saying it will affect credit elsewhere?neilmcl said:
It rarely does, and then only if you happen to be a repeat VTer. Think about what goes on the credit file, a marker saying a VT has taken place, which is totally legitimate, followed by a note stating the credit agreement has been settled. There's no black mark here, but I guess we can agree to disagree.bazzyb said:
It’s unlikely to have an impact in the OP’s scenario as he is looking to take finance from a different provider and it sounds like he’s looking at main dealer finance so one would assume that his credit history would be relatively good.neilmcl said:
But as I mentioned in the first reply in this thread a VT marker will not have an adverse affect on the credit history, so what @lcc86 said is correct.bazzyb said:
Being allowed to do it doesn’t mean it won’t affect your credit file. If you VT an agreement it will definitely be marked as such, and will show on your credit history for six years.lcc86 said:OP in answer to your question, a VT should not affect your credit file as it's something you're allowed to do contractually.However saying in general terms that a VT will not affect somebody’s credit file is simply not true. It can (and does) affect lending decisions.0 -
I was asking whether that was what you were referring to - but obviously not.bazzyb said:
I’d say very unlikely. Some motor finance providers will either decline or impose terms based on VT but I’m not aware that other lenders would do this.ontheroad1970 said:
It's not just motor finance that access your credit file, though. Is BazzyB saying it will affect credit elsewhere?neilmcl said:
It rarely does, and then only if you happen to be a repeat VTer. Think about what goes on the credit file, a marker saying a VT has taken place, which is totally legitimate, followed by a note stating the credit agreement has been settled. There's no black mark here, but I guess we can agree to disagree.bazzyb said:
It’s unlikely to have an impact in the OP’s scenario as he is looking to take finance from a different provider and it sounds like he’s looking at main dealer finance so one would assume that his credit history would be relatively good.neilmcl said:
But as I mentioned in the first reply in this thread a VT marker will not have an adverse affect on the credit history, so what @lcc86 said is correct.bazzyb said:
Being allowed to do it doesn’t mean it won’t affect your credit file. If you VT an agreement it will definitely be marked as such, and will show on your credit history for six years.lcc86 said:OP in answer to your question, a VT should not affect your credit file as it's something you're allowed to do contractually.However saying in general terms that a VT will not affect somebody’s credit file is simply not true. It can (and does) affect lending decisions.0 -
When the country is circling the wagons for the impending storm of redundancies they are very likely to look at anything and everything when making a lending decision. Mortgage lenders are already tightening up.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
