We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Stopping a house sale

jessieJames2020
Posts: 7 Forumite

Hi,
I would be grateful for any help.
I am the executor of my late father's will, probate has been granted.
My father made a will, post (second) marriage, leaving all his property and possessions to his three children.
He explicitly stated that his wife was to receive nothing.
The property is owned as tenants in common, however a trust deed from 30 years ago, which my father seemed to have forgotten about, states that his wife was the sole beneficiary of the house.
This will be subject to a proprietary estoppel claim due to a number of issues and is not my immediate concern.
I have recently found out that his wife (who is totally unapproachable) has placed the house on the market and I am therefore concerned that she will sell the house, gift the money to her daughter, and disappear into the ether. (£450,000)
Am I right in saying that I need to complete an RX1 form from the land registry and apply for a restriction on the house?
And if so, does anyone know how I would word the restriction as it doesn't appear to fit in with any of the standard forms of restriction on the land registry website.
Many thanks, any help would be much appreciated.
I would be grateful for any help.
I am the executor of my late father's will, probate has been granted.
My father made a will, post (second) marriage, leaving all his property and possessions to his three children.
He explicitly stated that his wife was to receive nothing.
The property is owned as tenants in common, however a trust deed from 30 years ago, which my father seemed to have forgotten about, states that his wife was the sole beneficiary of the house.
This will be subject to a proprietary estoppel claim due to a number of issues and is not my immediate concern.
I have recently found out that his wife (who is totally unapproachable) has placed the house on the market and I am therefore concerned that she will sell the house, gift the money to her daughter, and disappear into the ether. (£450,000)
Am I right in saying that I need to complete an RX1 form from the land registry and apply for a restriction on the house?
And if so, does anyone know how I would word the restriction as it doesn't appear to fit in with any of the standard forms of restriction on the land registry website.
Many thanks, any help would be much appreciated.
0
Comments
-
Whatever the will stated, his widow may still choose to make a claim on the estate for reasonable financial provision, particularly if they were living together at the time of his death.
You are using the term 'proprietary estoppel' as if you understand it, but I'm not sure you do, given how readily you are dismissing the issue of the trust deed.
You clearly aren't a lawyer, and given the amount of cash at issue here, getting proper professional advice is your best protection.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!2 -
Marcon said:Whatever the will stated, his widow may still choose to make a claim on the estate for reasonable financial provision, particularly if they were living together at the time of his death.
You are using the term 'proprietary estoppel' as if you understand it, but I'm not sure you do, given how readily you are dismissing the issue of the trust deed.
You clearly aren't a lawyer, and given the amount of cash at issue here, getting proper professional advice is your best protection.0 -
jessieJames2020 said:Marcon said:Whatever the will stated, his widow may still choose to make a claim on the estate for reasonable financial provision, particularly if they were living together at the time of his death.
You are using the term 'proprietary estoppel' as if you understand it, but I'm not sure you do, given how readily you are dismissing the issue of the trust deed.
You clearly aren't a lawyer, and given the amount of cash at issue here, getting proper professional advice is your best protection.0 -
pphillips said:jessieJames2020 said:Marcon said:Whatever the will stated, his widow may still choose to make a claim on the estate for reasonable financial provision, particularly if they were living together at the time of his death.
You are using the term 'proprietary estoppel' as if you understand it, but I'm not sure you do, given how readily you are dismissing the issue of the trust deed.
You clearly aren't a lawyer, and given the amount of cash at issue here, getting proper professional advice is your best protection.
0 -
Doesn't sound like a very happy marriage if he's explicitly stated the wife is to get nothing.
Irrespective of what his will says, his wife can (and probably will) challenge it under the Inheritance Act. She has 6 months to do this once Probate has been granted so if I were you I'd start preparing to go to court.0 -
Thank you, I've just taken a look and there is indeed a restriction in place to that effect as they were tenants in common.
This still leaves the wife as the sole legal owner of the property, for all that her beneficial interest (may) be only 50%.
As such, it would still be possible for her to sell the property.
See here https://www.land-registry-documents.co.uk/information/joint-ownership-tennants/ under
Death of a Joint Proprietor
However this may be irrelevant if the Trust Deed is legally valid.1 -
jessieJames2020 said:Marcon said:Whatever the will stated, his widow may still choose to make a claim on the estate for reasonable financial provision, particularly if they were living together at the time of his death.
You are using the term 'proprietary estoppel' as if you understand it, but I'm not sure you do, given how readily you are dismissing the issue of the trust deed.
You clearly aren't a lawyer, and given the amount of cash at issue here, getting proper professional advice is your best protection.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0 -
Marcon said:jessieJames2020 said:Marcon said:Whatever the will stated, his widow may still choose to make a claim on the estate for reasonable financial provision, particularly if they were living together at the time of his death.
You are using the term 'proprietary estoppel' as if you understand it, but I'm not sure you do, given how readily you are dismissing the issue of the trust deed.
You clearly aren't a lawyer, and given the amount of cash at issue here, getting proper professional advice is your best protection.0 -
Do you really want a restriction on her selling the house? Or just a restriction that she only gets half the money until this is sorted out?
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0 -
jessieJames2020 said:
The property is owned as tenants in common, however a trust deed from 30 years ago, which my father seemed to have forgotten about, states that his wife was the sole beneficiary of the house.Never pay on an estimated bill. Always read and understand your bill0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards