We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

this might make you think twice about a leasehold property.....

2»

Comments

  • Mickey666 said:
    Also, I wonder what all these additional costs will do for the BTL market? I can see a lot of BTL flats becoming simply not profitable for the ownders, and what that in turn will mean for the private rental market. They don't think these things through do they.
    What happens to the private rental market? More BTL sell, more renters buy. Why is that a bad thing?
    If lots of additional charges are going to apply to flats, on top of existing service charges, then the profit on a rental property may not be enough. It might drive rents up or make more LL's give up and sell up. Probably in reality a bit of both.
    Not all renters want to buy. Many rent because they don't have the money to buy a property or they don't want to be committed to a mortgage and the additioinal charges but prefer the flexibility of renting. 
    I’m sure that’s true, though it seems strange not to want to commit to a 25 year mortgage in favour of committing to a lifetime of paying rent.  Seems a very high price to pay for ‘flexibility’.  Still, each to their own.  At least it creates a market for landlords to sit back and watch their wealth roll in.
    Do you know of any example of someone committing to a lifetime of paying rent (if they did that wouldn't be flexible at all)? I thought the longest tenancies were 12 months, so those who choose to rent could always buy in a year or so, or rent something else.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.