We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
End of long tenancy

Davidk
Posts: 6 Forumite

We have rented a house for 10 years, and the landlord wants to re-decorate and re-carpet. We have moved out and thoroughly cleaned the place and are still within the notice period. The landlord wants the maintenance work to take place within the time of our tenancy. I said they have to either wait until the end of the tenancy or cut short the notice period. They already have new tenant agreed and want 'back to back' tenancies. Is there a precedent for this sort of thing ?
0
Comments
-
Why does this bother you if you have already moved out? It's not going to interfere with your daily life.
1 -
Because it would save some rent to end the tenancy early. Also I don't want to be responsible for clearing up after the decorators as the end of tenancy inspection has not taken place yet.4
-
You could agree to the work if they reduce the rent for the remaining period of the tenancy. Also, request an inspection prior to the work being done.
Other than that, just refuse to let them do the work until your tenancy ends.0 -
Davidk said:Because it would save some rent to end the tenancy early. Also I don't want to be responsible for clearing up after the decorators as the end of tenancy inspection has not taken place yet.0
-
You do not have to agree to them doing the work before your tenancy ends, but it might help if you do. I would ask the LL to confirm in writinga) that your early surrender of the tenancy would be agreed, and rent charged pro rata upt to that date (and refunded if already paid), so that the work would not be done during your tenancyb) that the final inspection would be done before work commenced and your deposit returned. Note that after 10 years,most issues are likely to be 'fair wear and tear' which do not justify deductions.1
-
You can be a stick in the mud about this if you want. But if your relationship with your landlord has been good and you've moved out early of your own choice anyway, why end on a sour note (and spoil things for the new tenant)?Now if your LL has been rubbish, if you've been asking them to redecorate for years and they always refused, that kind of thing, then I can understand why you would be disinclined to do them a favour.I agree with ensuring inventory is taken before the redecoration.2
-
It would make things neater for both sides if the LL ended your tenancy early and refunded that portion of the rent and return your deposit. I'm cynical and think you raise a fair point in saying you don't want to be liable for any mess or damaged caused by the builders. It's 'nice to be nice' but I would want an agreement in writing if any changes are made to the original tenancy agreement.
0 -
I totally agree with the OP - if the LL wants to redecorate (reasonable after a 10-year tenancy) then the OP should not have to pay rent for that period. Also, the OP should get all the deposit back as any minor issues will be resolved through the redecoration that is being done regardless.
The LL has been very fortunate to have a 10-year unbroken spell of income and now needs to take the rough side of running a rental business for a short period. Fortunate again for the LL as they have the next tenant lined up, so no risk of an extended void period.0 -
I'm not sure you should be paying full rent while the house is in the middle of being re-decorated, particularly if you can't use it (e.g. because there is drying paint everywhere).
I think you do have a case for reduced rent for the day or two while the property is being redecorated.
The other way of looking at it, is to agree to what the landlord wants, if the landlord confirms he is happy with the condition of the property and agrees that the deposit will immediately be refunded in full at the end of the tenancy?0 -
Thanks for all comments. Of course this is all being done through a rental agent, so its difficult to tell whether it it is them inisting on back to back tenancies rather than the landlord. I will continue to push for an early inventory check and termination of tenancy giving them a week or so for decorating/recarpeting, which should result in a refund of £300 or so, from your comments above this doesn't seem unreasonable and I don't see how it would affect the next tennants.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards