We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Baldrick's cunning plan
Comments
-
You don't have to do that, you could pick passive funds in sectors you think will outperform.Bobziz said:
Thanks, you may well be right, but at this time I don't have the confidence to pick what may turn out to be top performing funds. I like the idea of having the bulk of my portfolio as a passive investment, rather than trying to pick talented fund managers that might outperform the market.AnotherJoe said:I don't think you are being bold enough. Pick some funds or ITs or ETFs or shares with reasonable prospects of high growth. Not a bond fund. Or an all world index.So maybe the BG fund. But not the others.I could suggest other ideas but I guess that's up to you to do some research but going back to your original premise, it's too cautious IMOFor example to non randomly pick three sectors , technology. Renewables, healthcare.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
