We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Restrictive Covenant
Comments
-
Yes, covenants still apply to freehold property.stragglebod said:
I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that restrictive covenants could still apply to freehold properties. That wording would cover anything as minor as a gate post. The key question is: who was the original vendor, are they still around or have the covenant rights been transferred to anyone, and will anyone care?Rosa_Damascena said:
Look into the possibility of buying the freehold. Then you can do what you like on the property.MattR1 said:
Built in 1930Homer_home said:
Just crack onMattR1 said:
It states:stator said:You don't normally need permission for a small fence and gate.Restrictive Covenants can be anything. How old is it? Who has the 'benefit' of it? What does it say?
1 - Not to erect any building or erection whatsoever on the property without consent of vendor first obtained
So if I wanted to build a small brick post at the end of my drive to fit the other gate to, it looks like I would need to gain consent from the Vendor?
You dont need to go cap in hand to the vendor to ask permission for a security gate on a property you own
Is this a new build?
Do you even know who the vendor is?
Need to look into who Vendor is
The builder probably doesn't exist anymore, the original vendor probably isn't around anymore. If either are still about they probably won't care or even remember about the covenant. Just do it.Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.0 -
Agreed, but ask yourself who is monitoring...? You'd have to hold a serious grudge to nosey into someone else's business for the sake of it so for all intents and purposes, ownership of the freehold manages risk. And of course offers much more freedom around the property itself.stragglebod said:
I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that restrictive covenants could still apply to freehold properties. That wording would cover anything as minor as a gate post. The key question is: who was the original vendor, are they still around or have the covenant rights been transferred to anyone, and will anyone care?Rosa_Damascena said:
Look into the possibility of buying the freehold. Then you can do what you like on the property.MattR1 said:
Built in 1930Homer_home said:
Just crack onMattR1 said:
It states:stator said:You don't normally need permission for a small fence and gate.Restrictive Covenants can be anything. How old is it? Who has the 'benefit' of it? What does it say?
1 - Not to erect any building or erection whatsoever on the property without consent of vendor first obtained
So if I wanted to build a small brick post at the end of my drive to fit the other gate to, it looks like I would need to gain consent from the Vendor?
You dont need to go cap in hand to the vendor to ask permission for a security gate on a property you own
Is this a new build?
Do you even know who the vendor is?
Need to look into who Vendor isNo man is worth crawling on this earth.
So much to read, so little time.0 -
Restrictive covenants are on the title deeds regardless of who owns them, they remain until removed.
From 1930 you would need to check who, if anyone, is alive to enforce it. If so contact them and ask if they would be willing to allow the removal of the covenant. After this time it shouldn't be a problem. If no one can be found you can ask to have it removed, info online on how to do it.
It looks like it's not about fences and gates though just no buildings, a gate post isn't a building.1 -
The house that we live in and own has a purchasers covenant on that states you cannot build any boundary wall in front of the building line, the solicitor we used when purchasing the property explained it as you cannot put up a garden wall in front of the house as it was designed as open plan.0
-
Again just crack on and stop worrying
The original vendor would be around 110 years old if they were still alive and I would be amazed if you could locate them
No one will care0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
