We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

53 Aliases, 12 years old. How is this allowed from Experian?

Options
I’m not trying to hide from anything, my credit score is excellent. When checking my report I noticed 53 aliases. This concerned me as I have been married nearly 12 years. Not one of my accounts listed, new or old, settled or active were ever under my old name. All of my accounts have been open since marriage. Also the ‘alias’ is being reported by Experian themselves, not any financial institution. They haven’t just done it once though, they have done it 53 times!
How is this relevant to my credit file and finances and how many times does it need to be reported. Looking at my report, you’d think (according to Experian) this is a regular alias I have used over the recent past (multiple times) and that’s just not true! I want to go for a mortgage and whether it impacts it or not, I don’t see how Experian are allowed to keep spamming my file with incorrect data! No other credit file does this!

Comments

  • Missboo
    Missboo Posts: 17 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    I have, are you usually so polite and helpful to new forum posters? When I googled it I saw lots of similar posts to mine and wondered if anyone had answers.

    Thanks for being so helpful though and not at all rude.
  • https://www.checkmyfile.com/articles/3024/credit-reports/other-names-on-my-credit-report.htm

    Although I must admit I really don't see what the problem is here.
  • Missboo
    Missboo Posts: 17 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    So they shouldn’t be on there then. They aren’t active. That’s the issue. For some reason Experian are reporting that this a a current alias, which it isn’t and isn’t linked to any financial institution on my file. Not only that, it is reporting I’ve used this alias 53 times in the past few years. It’s coming from them, no one else. That’s the problem.

    For all the people who just want to be rude to a new poster. I’ve reported you all as no, the exact answer wasn’t found. So off you pop.

    To the one person who tried to help, thanks!
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 August 2020 at 7:10PM
    Missboo said:
    So they shouldn’t be on there then. They aren’t active.

    You say "they" but your post is a little vague whether it's just your maiden name or whether it's other names you've gone by in the past etc. https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/why-previous-names-appear-on-your-credit-report/
    If it's names you've never ever gone by, then that is more worrying.
    If it's your maiden name repeated 53 times then it's a bit weird, but it won't look to anyone like you're doing anything wrong.
  • Missboo
    Missboo Posts: 17 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    It’s my maiden name. But it’s not been used as an alias for 12 years so the reasons they give in that link don’t match my circumstances. They are reporting my alias so frequently that is is still showing as an active alias, which has been linked no less than 53 times in a few years.  That’s what is bothering me as one it’s not accurate, two it has created a ridiculous amount of recent alias links all owned by Experian themselves, plus according to their own reasons there is no reason for them to be constantly reporting this alias. Thanks for the link. I’ll see what they say, it’s just a bit weird they keep reporting this alias when no other institution is, it’s 12 years out of date and is directly coming from them. 
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 August 2020 at 10:59PM
    Missboo said:
    But it’s not been used as an alias for 12 years so the reasons they give in that link don’t match my circumstances. 
    Where does it say in the link that you had to use your maiden name within 12 years for it to be included?
    All I can see is that they say they include previous names to help prevent fraud.
  • I've reverted to my original name, but still have quite a lot of 'aliases' shown in my married name. They are all accounts that I had, so I'm not really concerned about it, it's just fact: I had those accounts under that name. So I'd check to make sure the accounts are all yours, and so long as they are then it's just facts reported, as they should be.
    My divorce was probably 15+ years ago, but it remains a fact that I was known by that name - it shows the dates, so you should see that it is a past occurrence being shown. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.