PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

My mother has a LEASEHOLD HOUSE and I've only just found out, as has she!!

Options
2

Comments

  • letsbetfair
    letsbetfair Posts: 961 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Do check it's the genuine freeholder, but I agree £650 seems worthwhile. Only exception might be if it's an extremely cheap house - I'd be more wary about paying £650 for the freehold of a £40,000 house, say...
  • oystercatcher
    oystercatcher Posts: 2,359 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 July 2020 at 10:17PM
    Check this is genuine, it seems to be too cheap to be true. When I bought the freehold of my place I had to pay both sets of legal fees as well as the cost of the freehold it seems strange the company are offering pay the fees which were a couple of thousand in my case.

    If it is genuine then if Mum can afford it it's probably worthwhile for whenever the property is sold although there are loads of leashold properties here and it doesn't affect value much.  I just prefer the 'completeness' it gives . 
    Decluttering, 20 mins / day Jan 2024 2/2 
  • davidmcn said:
    An ultra long leasehold with peanuts ground rent and no onerous covenants is for all practical purposes freehold, so I wouldn't get very excited about it either way. £650 for eliminating the risk of paranoid leasehold-averse buyers is probably worthwhile though. 
    Well, first of all many paranoid leasehold-averse buyers are paranoid leasehold-averse because they may have had awful experiences themselves with leasehold. Is there a managing charge? Do you need to get (and pay for) consent from the freeholder for renovations, changes to the property, etc? These are the things that would worry me the most. Maybe your current freeholder is decent, but it can still sell to another, predatory one in the future.

    Then, whether preferences are rational or not doesn't matter much. Many people from other countries find it totally bonkers that so many British buyers like wooden doors and single-glazed wooden windows, which are so thermally inefficient that they are illegal abroad, yet, guess what, these foreigners are still a minority and they don't make the market. Similarly, whether an aversion to leasehold is reasonable or not will matter little if potential buyers walk away when they hear the word 'leasehold'
  • LandyAndy
    LandyAndy Posts: 26,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    TBagpuss said:
    zagubov said:
    Absolutely, some buyers would freak out at the word Leasehold just like some freak out at Japanese Knotweed.
    That price would be bargain.

    For good reason.
    Not necessarily. Modern leaseholds with escalations clauses are a major concern, however older ones with nothing similar are not usually a problem. My first house had been built in 1902 and had a long lease (999 ears, I think)  Ground rent was £6 a year.
    The lease prevented me from running a tannery in the back yard or keeping a disorderly house or selling spirituous liquors from the property, so I suppose it might have been a problem if I had been a part-time tanner running a brothel and drinking club from he front room, but otherwise,  not an issue at all. 
    Exactly this.
    My first house was built in the 30's, 999 year lease, £4pa ground rent, and very similar conditions.  Almost all houses in that area, South Manchester, were leasehold then (1980).
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    $650 = bargain, bite their hand off.  So long as it is genuine and not a scam.  You will need your own Conveyancing Solicitor, but that is also a low cost service - we just did a lease extension and the solicitor cost was hardly anything.
  • Thanks everyone!! Brilliant advice. I love this site!!  :)
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 23 July 2020 at 1:19PM
    I'm also going to go against the flow here. With 793 years left on the lease, and assuming a peppercorn ground rent, I cannot see that ownership of the freehold is going to increase the value of the property by even £650. It's also not going to make the property less desirable, as the odds are that all the neighbouring houses are also freehold, with a similar lease remaining. 
    The only people who would be put off are those with an unfounded suspicion of leasehold property, who seem to be numerous.  It doesn't seem to deter anyone from buying a flat, or a house in most of inner London.

    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • Emmia
    Emmia Posts: 5,693 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 23 July 2020 at 1:30PM
    macman said:
    I'm also going to go against the flow here. With 793 years left on the lease, and assuming a peppercorn ground rent, I cannot see that ownership of the freehold is going to increase the value of the property by even £650. It's also not going to make the property less desirable, as the odds are that all the neighbouring houses are also freehold, with a similar lease remaining. 
    The only people who would be put off are those with an unfounded suspicion of leasehold property, who seem to be numerous.  It doesn't seem to deter anyone from buying a flat, or a house in most of inner London.

    With flats in London leasehold is a fact of life as a flat only occupies part of a building, and very few are share of freehold.

    I wouldn't buy a leasehold house though whether in London or outside - even if the ground rent is very small and the lease is very long as I'd want to own the whole building and the land under it.
  • blue_max_3
    blue_max_3 Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    My mothers house was freehold, but she had to pay a chief rent of £10pa. That was in Cheshire and I believe it's not unusual i n the NW of England.
    This touches on it... https://www.moneywise.co.uk/property/buy-sell/buying-freehold-home-check-small-print
    She diligently sent off her cheque every year! We sold the house after she passed away and it wasn't a problem at all. She could have bought it for something like £270, but it never seemed good value.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.