We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Furlough leave
evetomlinson
Posts: 1 Newbie
Wondering if anybody can provide me with some advice with my situation please...
I have been furloughed since April, receiving 80% of my wage and it has been extended again until 31/07/2020. My query is regarding staff, as myself and 7 other staff members in the company I work for are on furlough and since our furlough leave my company have hired a new starter who started on the 6th July 2020. Is this acceptable? I’m slightly frustrated as I’m confused as to how they can keep us on furlough and then hire a new staff member instead of honouring their employees loyalty and bringing us back first? Sorry if it’s me just being silly but I think it’s wrong and could do with someone’s advice who knows what they’re talking about.
I have been furloughed since April, receiving 80% of my wage and it has been extended again until 31/07/2020. My query is regarding staff, as myself and 7 other staff members in the company I work for are on furlough and since our furlough leave my company have hired a new starter who started on the 6th July 2020. Is this acceptable? I’m slightly frustrated as I’m confused as to how they can keep us on furlough and then hire a new staff member instead of honouring their employees loyalty and bringing us back first? Sorry if it’s me just being silly but I think it’s wrong and could do with someone’s advice who knows what they’re talking about.
Thank you.
0
Comments
-
entirely within the rules, perhaps not within the spirit but there’s no fraud, the company are claiming the money and passing it directly to you.1
-
Depends on circumstances. If the new worker has perhaps been hired to get them trained up for you all returning, or has been hired on a casual/zero hours basis because the employer doesn't have enough steady work to guarantee your hours, then it wouldn't be an abuse of the scheme necessarily. If they could have brought you back but instead chose to employ someone else to do your job under the same terms, that would likely be an abuse under the new rules - which state the purpose is to cover costs where employment activities of the employee are disrupted by covid and that no claim may be made if it doesn't align with that purpose.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards