We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Life insurance terms
Comments
-
You can take out a new policy, although it will inevitably be more expensive now, if you were to insure for the same sum.0
-
When you took-out the policy you would have signed a proposal form stateing the type of life policy you wanted and saying that you wished to take-out a policy for a term of 25 years. The documentation you were sent at the time would have confirmed this. If you take a look at your policy, the schedule will say something like this:Sum Assured £___________ (amount) payable on death before _____________(date of expiry of the policy)Term assurance is the cheapest form of life cover. There is no investment element, therefore there was no surrender value and no pot of money. All of the premium you paid each month was used to purchase life cover each month. If you had stopped paying, the policy would have terminated, as it did at the end of the term.Sadly, I cannot see any point in complaining about this0
-
I was not told that it was term this is something I was not told at the time,
1 - The product would be called a term assurance. The quote issued at the time would have stated the term
2 - The cancellation rights issued would have reconfirmed the premium, the sum assured and the term.
3 - the policy schedule would have stated the premium, the sum assured and the term
It is probably more likely that you forgot or though the term was sufficient for the need.
A whole of life assurance plan from 1995 would have been investment linked and obsolete by today's standards. It would have cost an awful lot more than the term assurance.
I am shocked as I was lead to believe I would pay this for life and have something to leave my sons.Are your sons financially worse off in the event of your death? i.e. do they need the life assurance policy now?
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Thank you everyone for your replies, they have been very helpful, I understood this was for life not for term I will wait and see what Scottish Widows say.
0 -
Have you looked for your original paperwork to see what it says?
I'd struggle to remember what I had for dinner on Friday let alone the conversation on life insurance 25 years ago... unfortunately our memory can deceive us. As others have said, there is a massive difference in premiums between a policy that pays out IF you die before the age of XX (eg 65) and one that pays out no matter when you die.
0 -
Even if it wasn't what you thought you were getting, you've had what you paid for i.e. insurance which would have paid out if you had died during the 25 years. I'm not sure what any sort of complaint after 25 years is going to achieve.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards