We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
What on Earth is Happening at smile Bank?
Comments
-
eskbanker said:DairyQueen said:eskbanker said:but the fact remains that Smile is a tiny niche provider, in the context of the wider market you were citing, regardless of how long they've been in existence for.0
-
It appears that it is now fixed. The Co-op Bank web site says:
8am, Saturday 11 July:
Following emergency maintenance on both our smile and Co-operative Bank systems, we have been able to restore access to smile online banking and the smile mobile app for our customers. We are extremely sorry for the inconvenience this issue has caused as we know this is not the standard of service expected from us. Thank you for bearing with us.
We will work to support any of our customers who have experienced any detriment whilst smile online banking and the smile app were unavailable and we encourage any impacted customers to contact us to discuss their circumstances.
There's also a BBC News article (dated yesterday) here.
1 -
And everyone is happy to rush towards a cashless society. Once it is in place you are then at the mercy of banks and authorities to prevent you using your account at their will. This is a taste of things to come.
1 -
DairyQueen said:eskbanker said:DairyQueen said:eskbanker said:but the fact remains that Smile is a tiny niche provider, in the context of the wider market you were citing, regardless of how long they've been in existence for.
Anyway, you'll doubtless be delighted that the BBC have finally managed to scrape together a piece about this, albeit only by going for a patronising human interest angle - it mentions that Smile only has 100,000 customers so it shouldn't be a surprise that mainstream media choose to report on stories of more interest to the other 99.85% of the population....4 -
j.p said:DairyQueen said:SebH said:The Co-op website is working fine for me this morning, I logged in to internet banking about 15 minutes ago without any problems. It seems to have been fixed!
It's also frustrating that Smile won't say what is wrong on the web site or how long it'll take, or have a dedicated status page displaying more information. Other banks have also a notification system whereby you can subscribe to an SMS alert that tells you when it's working again. This shouldn't be too complicated to implement. It wouldn't even need to match that against customer records: just notify any number that the web site visitor enters.
They could also make a statement promising to make good any fees or charges customers incur due to their inability to use online banking. As this is not any bank with an online system, it is a bank that is precisely predicated on being an online bank.
Meanwhile, the home page reads "These are just words. We'd rather let our products do the talking." Ironic if you ask me.
1 -
Disingenuous comment? Your username suggests so. I doubt the relevance has been missed by the majority on this forum.
Not sure what the value or relevance is of unsupported speculation about a hypothetical scenario involving an entirely different small bank?eskbanker said:but the fact remains that Smile is a tiny niche provider, in the context of the wider market you were citing, regardless of how long they've been in existence for.7 -
I do wonder that they transferred everything over to the co-op back end working system. Both Smile and Co-Op went down. One wonders why they have kept Smile going in the first place.bloodynicebloke said:And everyone is happy to rush towards a cashless society. Once it is in place you are then at the mercy of banks and authorities to prevent you using your account at their will. This is a taste of things to come.1
-
The strangest of the almost obsolete brands has to be cahoot. I've had a cahoot current account for years and it is still fully functional. I used it the other day to pay cash in at the Post Office to then transfer to my day-to-day current account which has no means of paying in cash. I notice Santander, of which cahoot is a brand, is advertising cahoot loans. I have often wondered why Santander keeps it going and hasn't simply shifted accounts over to the main brand. The main office for cahoot is now in Belfast, another oddity for a bank based in England.
2 -
DairyQueen said:eskbanker said:DairyQueen said:eskbanker said:but the fact remains that Smile is a tiny niche provider, in the context of the wider market you were citing, regardless of how long they've been in existence for.
This one seems quite restful. https://www.facebook.com/Eskbank-Wildlife-and-Biodiversity-corridor-451587875613462/
And this one quite educational: https://www.visitscotland.com/info/towns-villages/eskbank-p2402210 -
London7766551 said:I do wonder that they transferred everything over to the co-op back end working system. Both Smile and Co-Op went down. One wonders why they have kept Smile going in the first place.bloodynicebloke said:And everyone is happy to rush towards a cashless society. Once it is in place you are then at the mercy of banks and authorities to prevent you using your account at their will. This is a taste of things to come.
Essentially, it seems very similar to the great RBS/NatWest/Ulster meltdown of 2012, when a faulty upgrade to CA-7 ruined their batch processing and cut off access to accounts. In this instance, it seems like, whatever upgrade it was, was tried first on the smile system as it’s the smaller number of customers. Normally, it would presumably have been applied to the parallel Co-op system immediately after. Except they must have noticed immediately that it had gone wrong, so it was never applied to the Co-op system. This must be why only smile faced problems.
My guess is both were then taken down as the two databases were merged from the “good” Co-op copy and the transactions were then re-applied through batch processing. Either that, or fixing the problem with the patch took all week, then it was applied to the Co-op system overnight and the smile system was rolled-back to before the maintenance, the fixed version of the patch applied and then batch processing run again to get accounts up to date?
I find this sort of thing oddly fascinating, so it’s interesting to see what might have happened. Personally, I think it’s poor that they don’t bother to come out and give customers a proper explanation!2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards