PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Stamp duty holiday ?

Options
2456710

Comments

  • eidand
    eidand Posts: 1,023 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 5 July 2020 at 6:33PM
    Slithery said:
    I think the OP means he is buying his second home, not that he will own two houses. I'd guess he didn't pay stamp duty first time round as an FTB and now will have to.

    I do think stamp duty thresholds should be increased as the cut off of £125k is far too low compared to how house prices have risen.

    For 2nd home owners, the rate should be lifted massively to discourage it. 20-30% of house value kind of territory. Or the alternative would be to introduce a wealth tax on 2nd homes, something which would also capture current 2nd home owners, which stamp duty changes wouldn't do. A wealth tax on property should be something of the order of 5% of property value per year.
    And where will all the tenants live when this causes LL's to sell their properties?
    box on the street should be cheap enough, I guess.
    Careful what you wish for, stupid changes produce terrible effects.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Slithery said:
    And where will all the tenants live when this causes LL's to sell their properties?
    They'll all be owner-occupiers, obvs...

    Reductio ad absurdum, of course.

    The SDLT and income tax changes won't make ALL LLs sell their let properties. Just the ones who were borderline-profitable anyway, if they bothered to admit it to themselves. The "Accidentals", the "Oooh, this'll be a nice investments", the "What do you mean, I can't just move straight back in when I return from travelling?", the basically clueless.
  • danlightbulb
    danlightbulb Posts: 946 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 5 July 2020 at 10:10PM
    Slithery said:
    I think the OP means he is buying his second home, not that he will own two houses. I'd guess he didn't pay stamp duty first time round as an FTB and now will have to.

    I do think stamp duty thresholds should be increased as the cut off of £125k is far too low compared to how house prices have risen.

    For 2nd home owners, the rate should be lifted massively to discourage it. 20-30% of house value kind of territory. Or the alternative would be to introduce a wealth tax on 2nd homes, something which would also capture current 2nd home owners, which stamp duty changes wouldn't do. A wealth tax on property should be something of the order of 5% of property value per year.
    And where will all the tenants live when this causes LL's to sell their properties?
    I think its about asking what should really be incentivised here.

    Is it right for people to own 2nd homes by the seaside which are not let, and so empty for most of the year? This practice is destroying seaside communities. In this case, a wealth tax on the 2nd home would be appropriate and would likely release alot of these properties back for sale, which is a good thing.

    What about 2nd homes which are let out. I think that's different - they aren't really someone's 2nd home in that case, as its the person who rents it's home.

    What should happen with lets is that a direct 2nd home wealth tax shouldn't apply, however we do need controls to ensure the renter is not exploited. For example, is it appropriate for the rent to more than cover the mortgage of a property AND for the owner to also benefit from house price inflation on the property at the same time? Obviously we have capital gains tax, but that only applies when the property is sold and doesn't stop landlords from getting their tenants to cover their full mortgage plus more.

    So I think we need something that puts some controls in on this. I.e there should be rules that stipulate that a renter cannot pay more than 60-70% of the equivalent monthly mortgage for the property. This ensures that the landlords are themselves contributing to the cost of the property they will eventually benefit from owning when they liquidate it. It isn't right that landlords benefit from free house price inflation when the renter is paying their full mortgage plus more.

    I also think the current tax system for landlords is very unfair. Why should a landlord be able to offset their mortgage interest, new windows or other property repairs, buildings insurance etc costs against their tax bill when other homeowners cannot?
  • blue_max_3
    blue_max_3 Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I think some reform would be good. London and the SE prices are considerably more expensive, so the tax is a huge burden on even the smallest properties. But how to devise a fair system is a challenge. Suddenly abandoning a tax and then reinstating it later would be very cruel to those who slipped out of that window.
    There is talk of shopping vouchers coming soon, so that might be more likely. 
  • LIMPIT61
    LIMPIT61 Posts: 6 Forumite
    First Post
    If as now widely reported there is going to be an announcement by the Chancellor within his scheduled statement on Wednesday 8th July for a potential reduction in the threshold of STD, surely it would be madness/foolhardy making an announcement more than three months in advance of the reported date of the Autumn Budget (When again its reported the changes would be effective from), thus effectively freezing any planned completions within the housing market until end of October, early November ?  I am close to exchange/completion, but I suspect my Buyer will look to suspend the purchase should the reported changes be announced ?
      Thoughts please    
  • Very concerned our buyer will pull out / stall until the autumn. We're talking £13k stamp duty 😭
  • SpiderLegs
    SpiderLegs Posts: 1,914 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Holding off until autumn makes absolutely no sense. It will either come in immediately or won’t be announced at all.
    It sounds like the usual ‘float-an-idea-we-haven’t-really-thought-about in the media’ plan that is rife with politicians these days. Of course if they don’t announce it then some people will still hold off in the hope that they do. 

    Really though who knows what these idiots will dream up next.

  • dexterwolf
    dexterwolf Posts: 360 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 6 July 2020 at 2:32PM
    We are 2 weeks into a house purchase and for us it would save 8K and our sellers about 10.5K . So like others surely this would delay things where people just sit on it until Exchange . So surely if the government are doing this then it needs to come in within a few weeks really . The housing market is already very up and down and if this comes in and nothing moves for a few months it won't help it at all. I know its different but the Furlough scheme was put in place very quickly otherwise mass unemployment  so surely a decision like this needs a quick deadline not one months ahead. Otherwise don't do it at all.
  • jaxkesa
    jaxkesa Posts: 355 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'm in the middle of a purchase too and any deferred implementation of a SDLT holiday would be a nightmare.

    It's OK for those who are happy to wait 4 months but those in the chain who can't will have big problems. Many mortgage offers will expire for starters.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.